2011
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Decision Support Intervention on Decisional Conflict Associated with Microsatellite Instability Testing

Abstract: Background: Decision support to facilitate informed consent is increasingly important for complicated medical tests. Here, we test a theoretical model of factors influencing decisional conflict in a study examining the effects of a decision support aid that was designed to assist patients at high risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (CRC) deciding whether to pursue the microsatellite instability (MSI) test.Methods: Participants were 239 CRC patients at high familial risk for a genetic mutation wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with studies in other health decision settings, including the contexts of prostate cancer screening, [4447] colorectal cancer screening [48,49] genetic testing, [50,51] breast cancer surgery [52,53] and ovarian cancer risk management. [54] Randomized trials have shown the impact of decision support interventions on reduced DC, most often measured by the total score of the DCS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings are consistent with studies in other health decision settings, including the contexts of prostate cancer screening, [4447] colorectal cancer screening [48,49] genetic testing, [50,51] breast cancer surgery [52,53] and ovarian cancer risk management. [54] Randomized trials have shown the impact of decision support interventions on reduced DC, most often measured by the total score of the DCS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to the ODSF, 47 decision conflict is reduced by addressing contributors to uncertainty, including providing information about benefits and risks for options, helping patients understand their values and emotion reactions, and improving perceived preparedness. Studies have suggested that less preparedness 51 and knowledge 52 are associated with greater decisional conflict. 51 Thus, our results partially support the ODSF and prior work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have suggested that less preparedness 51 and knowledge 52 are associated with greater decisional conflict. 51 Thus, our results partially support the ODSF and prior work. However, knowledge, reasons to choose BR, and anxiety were not associated with decisional conflict when the other variables were included in the model, which is not consistent with the ODSF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing interventions targeted confirmed mutation carriers or women at risk for carrying a pathogenic mutation, and complemented the genetic counseling process by addressing primarily decision-making for genetic testing [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Other intervention outcomes include improving understanding of cancer genetics during counseling [37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]; enhancing carriers' well-being after testing [23,[47][48][49][50]; and supporting them during disclosure of genetic test results [51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%