2002
DOI: 10.1097/00001577-200204000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Dynamic Versus a Static Prone Stander on Bone Mineral Density and Behavior in Four Children with Severe Cerebral Palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cerebral palsy, gait, standing program Prolonged standing programs are used for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and have been shown to have wide-ranging positive effects in these children. Standing frames are recommended for children with limited mobility in the upright posture, including children with CP, to encourage proper alignment and weight bearing on the lower extremities (Gudjonsdottir & Mercer, 2002;Stuberg, 1992). Standing programs have been shown to increase range of motion (Baker, Cassidy, & Rone-Adams, 2007;Richardson, 1991;Tsai, Yeh, Chang, & Chen, 2001), improve muscle tone (Bohannon, 1993;Eng et al, 2001;Fefr, Fisher, & Langbein, 1994Odeen & Knutson, 1981;Pin, 2007;Shields & Dudley-Javoroski, 2005;Tremblay, Malouin, Richards, & Dumas, 1990;Tsai et al, 2001), improve bone growth, and increase bone mineral density (Caulton et al, 2004;Gudjonsdottir & Mercer, 2002;Gudjonsdottir & Stemmons, 1997;Stuberg, 1992;Wilmshurst, Ward, Adams, Langton, & Mughal, 1996), and are assumed to prevent or reduce secondary impairments by maintaining muscle extensibility, preventing muscle and soft tissue contracture, and promoting optimal musculoskeletal development (Stuberg, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebral palsy, gait, standing program Prolonged standing programs are used for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and have been shown to have wide-ranging positive effects in these children. Standing frames are recommended for children with limited mobility in the upright posture, including children with CP, to encourage proper alignment and weight bearing on the lower extremities (Gudjonsdottir & Mercer, 2002;Stuberg, 1992). Standing programs have been shown to increase range of motion (Baker, Cassidy, & Rone-Adams, 2007;Richardson, 1991;Tsai, Yeh, Chang, & Chen, 2001), improve muscle tone (Bohannon, 1993;Eng et al, 2001;Fefr, Fisher, & Langbein, 1994Odeen & Knutson, 1981;Pin, 2007;Shields & Dudley-Javoroski, 2005;Tremblay, Malouin, Richards, & Dumas, 1990;Tsai et al, 2001), improve bone growth, and increase bone mineral density (Caulton et al, 2004;Gudjonsdottir & Mercer, 2002;Gudjonsdottir & Stemmons, 1997;Stuberg, 1992;Wilmshurst, Ward, Adams, Langton, & Mughal, 1996), and are assumed to prevent or reduce secondary impairments by maintaining muscle extensibility, preventing muscle and soft tissue contracture, and promoting optimal musculoskeletal development (Stuberg, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standing position was a way to straighten the body and to strengthen the skeleton and the hip joints. This experience was supported by Caulton et al (2004) and Gudjonsdottir and Mercer (2002), who found that children who used standing devices showed an increased BMD compared to control groups. Standing one hour per day with the maximal achievable hip abduction and extension also had a positive effect on the migration percentage for children with cerebral palsy (Martinsson and Himmelmann, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Previous work by Gudjonsdottir found that the use of a motorized 'dynamic' stander may increase bone mineral density of children and adolescents and warranted further investigation [6]. However, due to the additional complications of joint contractures and severe risk of hip dislocations among others in the population considered in this study, neither Gudjonsdottir's or other 'dynamic' standing devices available on the market are appropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%