2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Higher-bioavailability Buprenorphine/Naloxone Sublingual Tablet Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence During Induction and Stabilization: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Abstract: Based on the findings from this study in patients with opioid dependence, the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet formulation was noninferior to both generic buprenorphine (induction) and BNX film (stabilization). These findings suggest that BNX sublingual tablets are an efficacious and well-tolerated option for induction and early stabilization treatment of opioid dependence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01908842.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the treatment phase in which the drop-out rate is highest. This was demonstrated in a recent large induction study with SL BUP-NLX which reported that approximately 25% of patients withdrew from treatment during the first 15 days [49]. In addition, approximately 24% of patients withdrew during the 7-14 day SL BUP run-in period in a trial of an extended-release BUP formulation [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…the treatment phase in which the drop-out rate is highest. This was demonstrated in a recent large induction study with SL BUP-NLX which reported that approximately 25% of patients withdrew from treatment during the first 15 days [49]. In addition, approximately 24% of patients withdrew during the 7-14 day SL BUP run-in period in a trial of an extended-release BUP formulation [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Findings from 2 randomized studies conducted in 1068 patients with opioid dependence provide robust evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of BNX-RDT during induction and maintenance ( Webster et al, 2014 ; Gunderson et al, 2015 ). The primary objective of the current extension study, which included patients who completed the primary efficacy trials, was to further evaluate the safety of longer-term treatment with BNX-RDT using assessments of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISTART was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority trial conducted at 43 centers in the United States, from August 2013 to April 2014; the primary efficacy and key secondary outcomes of ISTART were previously reported ( Gunderson et al, 2015 ). The study comprised a 2-day induction phase and a 20-day stabilization phase (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety assessments were performed using the safety population, which was defined as all patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication. As the coprimary endpoints of ISTART were retention in treatment at days 3 and 15 ( Gunderson et al, 2015 ), the handling of dropouts or missing data was not an issue. All secondary efficacy analyses were based on observed data in the full analysis population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%