2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-1009-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a prehabilitation program on patients’ recovery following spinal stenosis surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundDegenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is a prevalent condition in adults over the age of 65 and often leads to deconditioning. Although the benefits of surgery outweigh those of conservative approaches, physical rehabilitation may be used to improve function and to minimize the risk of persistent dysfunction. This study protocol was designed to establish the feasibility of a full-scale randomized controlled trial and to assess the efficacy of an active preoperative intervention program on the improveme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…comes of conservatively and surgically managed patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have been reported at 4 to 5 years postoperatively. 13,20,28 A recent trend has been to use prospectively collected clinical registries to evaluate the quality of lumbar spinal stenosis care and to optimize healthcare resource distribution. 4,8 A key field of investigation involves identification of preoperative factors and/or patient characteristics that may affect patient-reported outcomes after surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comes of conservatively and surgically managed patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have been reported at 4 to 5 years postoperatively. 13,20,28 A recent trend has been to use prospectively collected clinical registries to evaluate the quality of lumbar spinal stenosis care and to optimize healthcare resource distribution. 4,8 A key field of investigation involves identification of preoperative factors and/or patient characteristics that may affect patient-reported outcomes after surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, considering the persistent connection between preoperative disability and 10-year disability in our results, a question arises of whether preoperative rehabilitation could strengthen the postsurgical functional ability of LSS patients. This approach is currently being studied by Marchand et al (2015) who have designed an RCT study to determine the effects of an active preoperative intervention programme on the clinical parameters and functional physical capacity in patients undergoing LSS surgery. Our results suggest that the preoperative strategies to optimize long-term postoperative recovery might include physical rehabilitation as well as strengthening the salutogenic resources of LSS patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study was a single-blinded, two-arm randomized pilot trial and its detailed methods have been previously published elsewhere 24 . The trial received ethical approval from the institutional review boards of the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR) and the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec (CIUSSS-MCQ - formerly known as Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Trois-Rivières) (CÉR-2014-008-00).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical tests included lumbar extensor muscles endurance (modified Sorensen test), trunk flexor and extensor muscle strength (isometric contraction), knee extensor muscle strength (isometric contraction), active lumbar ranges of motion, walking abilities (time to first symptoms and total ambulation time), and maximal aerobic capacity. Study protocol provides further information about the selected outcomes 24 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%