1991
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199111000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a resistive training program on lipoprotein???lipid levels in obese women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
2
7

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
19
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the importance of weight and/or fat loss in the treatment of disturbances in plasma lipids and lipoproteins, it is not unreasonable to assume that the inability of exercise to induce an added benefit is at least partially explained by the inability of exercise to increase the reduction in total or abdominal adiposity. This is consistent with the observation that exercise in the absence of weight loss has little or no effect on the plasma lipid profi le (12, 15,52,53). In this way, it is suggested that improvement in obesity-related dyslipidemias may best be accomplished by the prescription of prolonged (30 -60 min/day) low-intensity (50 -60% VO 2max ) exercise on all or most days of the week (24,54 -56).…”
Section: Effects Of Weight Loss On Metabolic Risk Factorssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Given the importance of weight and/or fat loss in the treatment of disturbances in plasma lipids and lipoproteins, it is not unreasonable to assume that the inability of exercise to induce an added benefit is at least partially explained by the inability of exercise to increase the reduction in total or abdominal adiposity. This is consistent with the observation that exercise in the absence of weight loss has little or no effect on the plasma lipid profi le (12, 15,52,53). In this way, it is suggested that improvement in obesity-related dyslipidemias may best be accomplished by the prescription of prolonged (30 -60 min/day) low-intensity (50 -60% VO 2max ) exercise on all or most days of the week (24,54 -56).…”
Section: Effects Of Weight Loss On Metabolic Risk Factorssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…When these factors are controlled, most studies show no improvement in lipid profiles after RT in either middle-aged or older adults. 40,87,98,99 However, the lack of significant lipoproteinlipid changes with RT may be due to the fact that total cholesterol values for most study groups has been Յ200 mg/dL at study entry. Individuals with normal lipoproteinlipid profiles may require greater exercise stimulus and energy expenditure coupled with significant reductions in body weight to further improve lipid profiles.…”
Section: Resistance Training and Dyslipidemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 31 trials (involving 1833 participants) which were included (Table 1), one trial (Leon et al, 1996) used a cross-over design while the remaining studies used a parallel design. Twenty-seven studies used aerobic training exclusively, three studies used resistance training (Boyden et al, 1993;Johnson et al, 1983;Manning et al, 1991) and one study (Hersey et al, 1994) employed both resistance and aerobic training groups (Table 1). Five trials included participants of both sexes, ten trials contained only females and sixteen contained only males.…”
Section: Descriptive Data Of Included Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four trials failed to provide information on the dietary instructions or the measurement of dietary intake (Johnson et al, 1983;King et al, 1991;Suter et al, 1994;Toriola, 1984). In 19 trials, dietary intake was approximated via the completion of a 24-h (Lindheim et al, 1994), 48-h (Grandjean et al, 1996), 3-d (Baker et al, 1986;Duncan et al, 1991;Hersey et al, 1994;Houmard et al, 1994;Leon et al, 1996;Manning et al, 1991;Ready & Quinney, 1982;Ready et al, 1995;Wood et al, 1983) or 7-d (Binder et al, 1996;Hellenius 1993;Hinkleman & Nieman, 1993;Kiens et al, 1980;Nieman et al, 1993;Stensel et al, 1993;Williams et al, 1994;Wood et al, 1988) diet record at the beginning and the end of the training period. Two trials (Santiago 1995;Stein 1990) reported that dietary intake was monitored but did not report for what period.…”
Section: Quality Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%