“…There was great variability in the design of the studies. Typical formats investigated changes in attitudes following an intervention (e.g., Gibson & Chase, ; Jarvis & Pell, ; Kanter & Konstantopoulos, ; Klop, Severiens, Knippels, van Mil, & Ten Dam, ; Luehmann & Markowitz, ; Scherz & Oren, ; Tomas, Ritchie, & Tones, ; Zacharia, ), changes in attitudes over time (e.g., Barmby, Kind, & Jones, ; Mattern & Schau, ; Siegel & Ranney, ), describing the attitudes of a sample and the relations of these attitudes to other constructs, such as religiosity, exploration processes, content knowledge, gender, teachers' decisions and practices, cultural border crossing, situational interest (e.g., Donnelly & Boone, ; Krogh & Thomsen, ; Lawrenz et al, ; Marshall & Young, ; Palmer, ; Thompson & Mintzes, ; Zint, ) or the factors that be influencing these attitudes (e.g., Raved & Assaraf, ; Reid & Skryabina, ; Scantlebury et al, ), and comparing attitudes of differing populations, sometimes due to differing treatments (e.g., Bybee & McCrae, ; Cavallo & Laubach, ; Gwimbi & Monk, ; Jones et al, ; Machina & Gokhale, ; Rennie & Williams, ; Tien et al, ).…”