2009
DOI: 10.1080/09500690902943665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Science Education Module on Attitudes towards Modern Biotechnology of Secondary School Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding corresponds with the study conducted by Sagar et al (2000), France (2003), Klop et al (2010) and Latifah et al (2012). A moderate perception towards biotechnology among students may be due to a lack of access towards relevant information in order to disassemble the controversial issues that surround biotechnology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding corresponds with the study conducted by Sagar et al (2000), France (2003), Klop et al (2010) and Latifah et al (2012). A moderate perception towards biotechnology among students may be due to a lack of access towards relevant information in order to disassemble the controversial issues that surround biotechnology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, this research was executed based on the findings of Dawson and Venville (2009), who stated that there were many studies in assessing community's knowledge, perception and attitudes towards biotechnology in developed countries (Klop et. al 2010;Dawson & Venville, 2009;Klop & Severiens, 2007;Sturgis et.…”
Section: Elements In Scientific Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other articles reported attempts to interest students by contextualising learning within the professional contexts of crime-solving police stories [78] or authentic genetic laboratory work [114]. This last case had even more success with children that already showed a rather high interest in S&T.…”
Section: Contextualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was great variability in the design of the studies. Typical formats investigated changes in attitudes following an intervention (e.g., Gibson & Chase, ; Jarvis & Pell, ; Kanter & Konstantopoulos, ; Klop, Severiens, Knippels, van Mil, & Ten Dam, ; Luehmann & Markowitz, ; Scherz & Oren, ; Tomas, Ritchie, & Tones, ; Zacharia, ), changes in attitudes over time (e.g., Barmby, Kind, & Jones, ; Mattern & Schau, ; Siegel & Ranney, ), describing the attitudes of a sample and the relations of these attitudes to other constructs, such as religiosity, exploration processes, content knowledge, gender, teachers' decisions and practices, cultural border crossing, situational interest (e.g., Donnelly & Boone, ; Krogh & Thomsen, ; Lawrenz et al, ; Marshall & Young, ; Palmer, ; Thompson & Mintzes, ; Zint, ) or the factors that be influencing these attitudes (e.g., Raved & Assaraf, ; Reid & Skryabina, ; Scantlebury et al, ), and comparing attitudes of differing populations, sometimes due to differing treatments (e.g., Bybee & McCrae, ; Cavallo & Laubach, ; Gwimbi & Monk, ; Jones et al, ; Machina & Gokhale, ; Rennie & Williams, ; Tien et al, ).…”
Section: Overview Of Research On Affect In Jrst Scied and Ijse Betwmentioning
confidence: 99%