2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1087-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a secondary task on obstacle avoidance in healthy young adults

Abstract: Research studying attention and gait stability has suggested the process of recovering gait stability requires attentional resources, but the effect of performing a secondary task on stability during obstacle avoidance is poorly understood. Using a dual-task paradigm, the present experiment investigated the extent to which young adults are able to respond to a secondary auditory Stroop task (requiring executive attentional network resources) concurrently with obstacle crossing during gait as compared to perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Allocation of attentional resources to a secondary task (transporting the object) may have been reduced during altered gait, and as a consequence this may have affected grip-inertial force precision, similar to performance decrements shown in other dual-task performances (e.g., Chen et al 1996;Müller et al 2004;Siu et al 2008;Sternad et al 2007;Weerdesteyn et al 2003). Even though grip force oscillation are usually not consciously perceived (Flanagan et al 1993), subjects may still be susceptible to temporal decrements related to the overall attention demands of a task.…”
Section: Temporal Precision Of Anticipatory Grip Force Varies Dependimentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allocation of attentional resources to a secondary task (transporting the object) may have been reduced during altered gait, and as a consequence this may have affected grip-inertial force precision, similar to performance decrements shown in other dual-task performances (e.g., Chen et al 1996;Müller et al 2004;Siu et al 2008;Sternad et al 2007;Weerdesteyn et al 2003). Even though grip force oscillation are usually not consciously perceived (Flanagan et al 1993), subjects may still be susceptible to temporal decrements related to the overall attention demands of a task.…”
Section: Temporal Precision Of Anticipatory Grip Force Varies Dependimentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Effects of gait variations on grip force coordination during object transport. J Neurophysiol 100: 2477-2485, 2008. First published August 27, 2008doi:10.1152/jn.90561.2008.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the Stroop task was sufficient to compete with the processing demands of the postural tasks. This study's auditory Stroop task has been used to evaluate dual-task effects on gait in healthy young adults as well as older adults with and without balance impairments [33][34][35]. The findings of these studies vary, such that dual-task costs depend on the complexity of the gait tasks, may affect either Stroop performance or gait performance, and are dependent on how the subjects prioritize performance toward either the Stroop task or the gait task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When crossing an obstacle, individuals modulate the effector system according to obstacle characteristics (Mohagheghi, Moraes & Patla, 2004;Siu et al, 2008). Young adults modulate the take off distance, toe clearance, and gait speed according to the obstacle features (Patla, Prentice & Gobbi, 1996;Bradshaw & Sparrow, 2001;Krell & Patla, 2002;Mohagheghi, Moraes & Patla, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%