2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1090-5138(01)00085-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a sexual assault scenario on handgrip strength across the menstrual cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, fertile women have been shown to display increased strength after being exposed to cues of sexual coercion [64], are more likely to avoid activities that put them at increased risk of sexual assault [65,66], and exhibit a greater tendency to infer coercive intent among strangers [67].…”
Section: The Role Of Women In Intergroup Conflict: Avoiding Sexual Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fertile women have been shown to display increased strength after being exposed to cues of sexual coercion [64], are more likely to avoid activities that put them at increased risk of sexual assault [65,66], and exhibit a greater tendency to infer coercive intent among strangers [67].…”
Section: The Role Of Women In Intergroup Conflict: Avoiding Sexual Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of scenarios allows the study of threatening situations that are difficult or unethical to experimentally reproduce in human beings, such as the investigation of behavior and physiological reactions to potential aggression (14), or sexual violence (15,16). On the other hand, the scenario approach does not measure the person's actual reaction to a real situation, allowing only an inference about what the individual believes he/she might do in that situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the theorizing above, a number of recent studies have found support for the proposition that women may possess psychological mechanisms that function to protect reproductive choice via the avoidance of sexually coercive threats (e.g., Bröder & Hohmann, 2003;Chavanne & Gallup, 1998;Fessler, Holbrook, & Fleischman, 2014;Guéguen, 2012;McDonald et al, 2011;Navarrete et al, 2009Navarrete et al, , 2010Petralia & Gallup, 2002) or which function to reduce the costs associated with sexual coercion (Chivers, Seto, Lalumière, Laan, & Grimbos, 2010). Relevant to the current research, in a series of studies Navarrete et al (2010;Studies 3 and 4) showed that racial bias against outgroup men is elevated among women who appraise themselves as being vulnerable to sexual coercion, even when controlling for domain-general fearfulness.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of a Sexual Coercion Threat Management Systemmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Past research has demonstrated that women exhibit greater vigilance and defensive mechanisms when faced with threatening stimuli at peak conception risk, without reference to the source of the threat (e.g. Bröder & Hohmann, 2003;Chavanne & Gallup, 1998;Fessler et al, 2014;Garver-Apgar et al, 2007;Guéguen, 2012;Petralia & Gallup, 2002). Given these findings, we might have expected women at peak conception risk who appraise themselves as vulnerable to sexual coercion to deny date requests from all men, regardless of whether it came from an ingroup or outgroup member.…”
Section: Conception Risk and Vulnerability To Sexual Coercionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation