2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13052750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Short-Term Trampling Experiment on Alpine Vegetation in the Tatras, Slovakia

Abstract: Over the past decades, outdoor recreation in mountains has become progressively more important and as a result human induced potential damage has increased. Alpine communities are particularly susceptible to human recreational activities, such as tourist trampling. Although there are a number of studies that explicitly assess the effects of trampling on alpine communities, they do not reflect on terrains with a rich topography and the presence of more communities in very small areas. In this study, effects of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental design. In each plant community (native and regenerated), one experimental block was established in the uniform vegetation (Piscová et al, 2021). This experimental block consists of one control and two trampled plots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental design. In each plant community (native and regenerated), one experimental block was established in the uniform vegetation (Piscová et al, 2021). This experimental block consists of one control and two trampled plots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One trampling procedure occured on the same day for all treatments, 4 times during the vegetation season, in June, July, August and September (Piscová et al, 2021). Each experimental plot is assigned one of the three trampling treatments: control (no trampling), 150 passes and 450 passes on the same day (Piscová et al, 2021). Following the Cole & Bayfield (1993) study, measured parameters were:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Kliment et al (2016) , like some other authors (e.g. Piscová et al (2021) ), consider S. kitaibeliana as an independent species. Chopyk and Fedoronchuk (2015) noted that these two species are very close, but also still delimited them, based on the differences in the leaf morphology (leaves are up to 2 cm long obovate, with a retuse tip in S. retusa and up to 4 cm long, oblong-obovate, with a pointed tip in S. kitaibeliana ).…”
Section: Checklistsmentioning
confidence: 99%