1999
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Small Monetary Incentive and Follow-up Mailings on Return Rates of a Survey to Nurse Practitioners

Abstract: The purpose was to examine the effectiveness of a modest monetary incentive ($1) and none in increasing the response rate of a mail survey to 600 nurse practitioners. The response rate in the incentive group was 81% and 66% in the control group, significant by chi-square test. The most cost effective survey technique for increasing the response rate of nurse practitioners was to code the envelopes and eliminate the monetary incentive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22] The first wave was sent by first-class mail to everyone on the initial random-sample mailing list. The first wave consisted of a hand-signed cover letter, a copy of the questionnaire printed on colored paper in a 4-page booklet format, a return stamped envelope, and a $1 monetary incentive.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22] The first wave was sent by first-class mail to everyone on the initial random-sample mailing list. The first wave consisted of a hand-signed cover letter, a copy of the questionnaire printed on colored paper in a 4-page booklet format, a return stamped envelope, and a $1 monetary incentive.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief cover letter explaining the confidentiality of responses and a copy of the questionnaire printed on pastel paper was mailed to the school nurses across the United States. Postage-paid, self-addressed, return envelopes, along with a $1 incentive were included in the initial mailing (Oden & Price, 1999). Approximately 2 weeks after the initial mailing, a second cover letter, another copy of the survey, and another postage-paid return envelope were sent to the school nurses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response rates are important in terms of statistical power, sampling error and generalizability (Gore-Felton et al, 2002) and increasing response rates should be an important consideration in designing any mail-based research. Through proper design such as the use of a pre-survey introductory letter, post-survey follow-up reminders and modest monetary incentives, response rates can be brought to reasonable levels (Erwin and Wheelright, 2002;Gore-Felton et al, 2002;Helgeson et al, 2002;Oden and Price, 1999). Highquality design can even bring up response rates for males, who are traditionally more reluctant mailing participants than females, in dealing with sensitive topics Science Publications CRP (Senn et al, 2000).…”
Section: Mail-in Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%