1996
DOI: 10.1080/09064709609415874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Strategic Feed Restriction on Pig Performance and Health during the Post-weaning Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…found that a 20% reduction in feeding increased the caecal concentration of volatile fatty acids and acidified caecal content while enhancing bacterial fibrolytic activity. In the present study, feed restriction increased the faecal populations of Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli on day 35, which is different from the observations of piglets fed a RE diet by Rantzer et al (1996). Lázaro et al (2004) reported that feed restriction and enzyme supplementation reduced the magnitude of problems in broiler chicks, especially jejunum viscosity problems, owing to the presence of rye in feed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…found that a 20% reduction in feeding increased the caecal concentration of volatile fatty acids and acidified caecal content while enhancing bacterial fibrolytic activity. In the present study, feed restriction increased the faecal populations of Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli on day 35, which is different from the observations of piglets fed a RE diet by Rantzer et al (1996). Lázaro et al (2004) reported that feed restriction and enzyme supplementation reduced the magnitude of problems in broiler chicks, especially jejunum viscosity problems, owing to the presence of rye in feed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results have been found by Daza et al (2003), who reported that pigs fed a RE diet reduced their feed intake but had a feed conversion ratio similar to that of pigs fed AD. Rantzer et al (1996) reported that, during the period of feeding restriction, the RE piglets had a lower diarrhoea score than those fed AD. The faecal scores of animals in this study were not influenced by feeding regimen, which indicates that feeding restriction did not impair their health status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed restriction applied during the first 6 days post weaning may have attenuated the short-term negative consequences of the poor sanitary conditions but also limited the performance of pigs housed in the good conditions. During a restrictive feed period of 7 days post weaning, pigs had a lower faecal score and proportion of faecal haemolytic Escherichia coli but lower performance than pigs offered feed ad libitum (Rantzer et al, 1996). In good sanitary conditions, pigs were housed in cleaned and disinfected rooms and received an antibiotic supplementation in contrast to pigs kept in poor sanitary conditions, which were housed in rooms that were not cleaned.…”
Section: Responses Of Pigs To the Degradation Of Sanitary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, restricted feeding from day 3 to 8 post-weaning reduced the incidence of diarrhea, proliferation of haemolytic E. coli., and mortality (Rantzer et al 1996). When ad libitum feeding was resumed on day 9 post-weaning, incidence and severity of diarrhea and proliferation of E. coli continued to be less in pigs that were previously restricted in their feed intake compared with pigs that were allowed ad libitum feeding during the entire postweaning period (Rantzer et al 1996).…”
Section: Restricted Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coli., and mortality (Rantzer et al 1996). When ad libitum feeding was resumed on day 9 post-weaning, incidence and severity of diarrhea and proliferation of E. coli continued to be less in pigs that were previously restricted in their feed intake compared with pigs that were allowed ad libitum feeding during the entire postweaning period (Rantzer et al 1996). In a Danish experiment, it was observed that restricting feed intake to 75% of ad libitum during the initial 14 d postweaning reduced mortality due to diarrhea by 50% and lowered therapeutic treatments for diarrhea by 56% compared with feeding ad libitum (Jørgensen et al 2000).…”
Section: Restricted Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%