Effects of accelerometer coupling on step counting accuracy in healthy older adults

Cleland, Ian; Nugent, Chris; Finlay, Dewar; Burns, William C. G.; Bougourd, Jennifer; Stevens, Katy; Armitage, Roger

doi:10.1007/s12553-012-0036-1

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, due to having features such as usability, portability, low cost, low power consumption, high sensitivity and small sizes, wearable sensors are commonly used in gait and other movement analyses research [1,6]. In gait research, wearable sensors have been mounted on feet/shoes [7][8][9][10][11], knees, thighs [12], ankles [5,13], shanks [14][15][16], chests [13] and waists [13,17] to analyse the gait parameters such as stride velocity, stride length, step length, cadence, step width, step angle, step time, swing time, stance time, gait phase, joint angles and momentum [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, the present study investigates the use of light-weight sensors in the clothing, specifically comparing how well the data from clothing correlate with data from sensors mounted on the frontal side of the lower body in gait analysis. In contrast with studies involving tight garments [13,28], in this study, we investigated everyday loose clothing, as this is likely to be more comfortable and acceptable for wearers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding data collection methodologies, many of the above-mentioned gait analysis studies used body-mounted wearable sensors. There were a smaller number of studies using clothing mounted sensors in gait analysis; however, the results were promising [13,39,40]. Cleland et al [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There were a smaller number of studies using clothing mounted sensors in gait analysis; however, the results were promising [13,39,40]. Cleland et al [13]. used a harness around the chest and waist with three sensors to compare step counting from body-and clothing-worn sensors Niazmand et al [39] studied accelerometers mounted in ordinary trousers to identify freezing of gait in people with Parkinson's, and their algorithm outputs were compared with a physician's report.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Comparing Loose Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Body-Mounted Sensors in the Analysis of Walking

Jayasinghe

Hwang

Harwin

2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A person’s walking pattern can reveal important information about their health. Mounting multiple sensors onto loose clothing potentially offers a comfortable way of collecting data about walking and other human movement. This research investigates how well the data from three sensors mounted on the lateral side of clothing (on a pair of trousers near the waist, upper thigh and lower shank) correlate with the data from sensors mounted on the frontal side of the body. Data collected from three participants (two male, one female) for two days were analysed. Gait cycles were extracted based on features in the lower-shank accelerometry and analysed in terms of sensor-to-vertical angles (SVA). The correlations in SVA between the clothing- and body-mounted sensor pairs were analysed. Correlation coefficients above 0.76 were found for the waist sensor pairs, while the thigh and lower-shank sensor pairs had correlations above 0.90. The cyclical nature of gait cycles was evident in the clothing data, and it was possible to distinguish the stance and swing phases of walking based on features in the clothing data. Furthermore, simultaneously recording data from the waist, thigh, and shank was helpful in capturing the movement of the whole leg.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparing Loose Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Body-Mounted Sensors in the Analysis of Walking

Jayasinghe

Hwang

Harwin

2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While considering that MIMUs, as well as marker clusters mounted on a single rigid plate, substantially present only the STA rigid component, it is expected that the rigid component itself may suffer from artefacts due to soft tissues wobbling more than what has been observed in clusters of skin markers ( Bonci et al, 2014 ). Therefore, in the case of a MIMU-based application, STA detrimental effect is particularly related to the unit weight/size and its attachment method ( Forner-Cordero et al, 2008 ; Cleland et al, 2012 ) and to the unit possible repositioning ( Decker et al, 2011 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Stability of MIMU Probes to Skin-Marker-Based Anatomical Reference Frames During Locomotion Tasks: Effect of Different Locations on the Lower Limb

Scalera

Ferrarin

Marzegan

et al. 2021

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soft tissue artefacts (STAs) undermine the validity of skin-mounted approaches to measure skeletal kinematics. Magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMU) gained popularity due to their low cost and ease of use. Although the reliability of different protocols for marker-based joint kinematics estimation has been widely reported, there are still no indications on where to place MIMU to minimize STA. This study aims to find the most stable positions for MIMU placement, among four positions on the thigh, four on the shank, and three on the foot. Stability was investigated by measuring MIMU movements against an anatomical reference frame, defined according to a standard marker-based approach. To this aim, markers were attached both on the case of each MIMU (technical frame) and on bony landmarks (anatomical frame). For each MIMU, the nine angles between each versor of the technical frame with each versor of the corresponding anatomical frame were computed. The maximum standard deviation of these angles was assumed as the instability index of MIMU-body coupling. Six healthy subjects were asked to perform barefoot gait, step negotiation, and sit-to-stand. Results showed that (1) in the thigh, the frontal position was the most stable in all tasks, especially in gait; (2) in the shank, the proximal position is the least stable, (3) lateral or medial calcaneus and foot dorsum positions showed equivalent stability performances. Further studies should be done before generalizing these conclusions to different motor tasks and MIMU-body fixation methods. The above results are of interest for both MIMU-based gait analysis and rehabilitation approaches using wearable sensors-based biofeedback.

show abstract

Accelerometer Artefacts from Body-Worn Sensors

McDonough

Hinton-Lewis

Espinosa

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 3rd International Colloquium on Sports Science, Exercise, Engineering and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effects of accelerometer coupling on step counting accuracy in healthy older adults

Cited by 3 publications

References 38 publications

Comparing Loose Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Body-Mounted Sensors in the Analysis of Walking

Comparing Loose Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Body-Mounted Sensors in the Analysis of Walking

Assessment of Stability of MIMU Probes to Skin-Marker-Based Anatomical Reference Frames During Locomotion Tasks: Effect of Different Locations on the Lower Limb

Accelerometer Artefacts from Body-Worn Sensors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About