Effects of acid hydrolysis waste liquid recycle on preparation of microcrystalline cellulose

Abstract

Large amounts of acidic waste are produced on the industrial scale during hydrolysis of partially amorphous cellulose to produce microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). The essential disposal and treatment of this highly acidic liquid wastes the acid feedstock and increases the production cost. To maximize the use of acid without sacrificing the MCC product quality, this project reports a successful attempt to recycle the acid hydrolysis waste liquid, focusing on the impact of waste recycling on MCC morphology and reducing sugar in the hydrolysate. The results showed that when the waste liquid is recycled 1-5 times, no metal accumulation occurred while cellulose particles remained intact, maintaining their shape and size. Their extent of crystallinity remained nearly constant, even increasing slightly with up to three cycles. The concentration of reducing sugar showed growth when recycling the waste liquid up to three times, although not quite to the levels that would allow for its cost-effective fermentation. The acid amount to be added at the start of each cycle was near 50% of that used on the first stage.

Recent Developments in Chemical Derivatization of Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC): Pre-Treatments, Functionalization, and Applications

“…200 MWh•t −1 to 9.6 MWh•t −1 ) [54]. These results, combined with the low environmental impact of this pre-treatment, make ball-milling a sustainable method to increase the accessibility of MCC [55][56][57].…”

An Overview of Recent Developments in Hetero-Catalytic Conversion of Cellulosic Biomass

“…However, this process generates a large volume of spent liquid acid or acidic waste, which is corrosive to the reactor and may result in adverse environmental impact. Handling and recycling those acidic wastes may incur additional production costs and required energy consumption (Xiu et al, 2019). Some industrial pilot plants had applied ultrafiltration and purification processes for recycling the spent liquid acid, which may also significantly add to the costs of existing NCCs production.…”