1984
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7061(84)90023-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of acidic and basic parent materials on formation of some soils in Quebec (Canada)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, if the 20× discrepancy were caused predominantly by macrofractures due to processes specific to the Piedmont, then granitic rocks elsewhere would not necessarily show thicker regolith than diabase (Figure ) because fracturing varies with local specifics of tectonics and exhumation. In fact, several authors have argued that the thickness of regolith as well as the thickness of weathering rinds (Fritz and Ragland, ; Gardner et al ., ; De Kimpe et al ., ; Fritz, ; Oh and Richter, ; Schroeder and West, ) are greater on felsic compared to mafic rocks where regolith‐forming factors such as climate and landscape position are similar. For example, our compilation of regolith thicknesses reported for granitic ( n = 13; average thickness = 13 · 7 m) and mafic bedrock ( n = 13; average thickness = 2 · 9 m) from humid temperate, tropic and subtropic climates show thicker regolith on granite (Figure ; Table I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if the 20× discrepancy were caused predominantly by macrofractures due to processes specific to the Piedmont, then granitic rocks elsewhere would not necessarily show thicker regolith than diabase (Figure ) because fracturing varies with local specifics of tectonics and exhumation. In fact, several authors have argued that the thickness of regolith as well as the thickness of weathering rinds (Fritz and Ragland, ; Gardner et al ., ; De Kimpe et al ., ; Fritz, ; Oh and Richter, ; Schroeder and West, ) are greater on felsic compared to mafic rocks where regolith‐forming factors such as climate and landscape position are similar. For example, our compilation of regolith thicknesses reported for granitic ( n = 13; average thickness = 13 · 7 m) and mafic bedrock ( n = 13; average thickness = 2 · 9 m) from humid temperate, tropic and subtropic climates show thicker regolith on granite (Figure ; Table I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Une comparaison plus poussée entre ces profils demanderait de connaître les compositions chimiques totales, surtout les teneurs en fer et aluminium dans les formations Bullstrode et Trinité. Les teneurs en Fe et Al déterminent la possibilité qu'ont ces éléments de former des complexes organomé-talliques, ce qui peut modifier considérablement le rapport (Fe + Al)p/argile dont la limite est fixée à 0,05 (DE KIMPE et al, 1984, DE KIMPE et DEJOU, 1986.…”
Section: Profil Intermédiaire Melbourne-savoieunclassified
“…In andDeKimpe 7977)andontario (Rutherford t"-pJ.ut" and northern latitudes continen-1975).lntheearly lg80sadditionalsaprolites tal ind alpine glaciers have scoured the were discovered in Quebec, as well as in New landscape iuch that most saprolites have Brunswick (Wang et al 1981) (1982) In the Kamloops profile smectite is also the dominant mineral in the soil (Fig. 2C, D Kamloops Ck Horizon 54cm depth …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%