1990
DOI: 10.2527/1990.68103322x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of active immunization against GnRH on LH, FSH and prolactin storage, secretion and response to their secretagogues in pony geldings.

Abstract: Six pony geldings were actively immunized against GnRH conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA) to study 1) the relative dependency of LH and FSH storage, secretion and response to GnRH analog on GnRH bioavailability and 2) the effects of reduced GnRH bioavailability on GnRH storage in the hypothalamus. Five geldings were immunized against BSA. Geldings were immunized in December and 4, 8, 14, 20, 26 and 32 wk later. Ponies immunized against GnRH had increased (P less than .01) GnRH binding in plasma within 6 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm the essential role of testosterone for spermatogenesis and epididymal function but leaves the question open why the changes in semen quality were highly variable between individual stallions despite constant low testosterone concentrations for more than 6 months. A possible explanation might be the different effect of GnRH immunization on pituitary LH and FSH secretion (Garza et al, 1986;Rabb et al, 1990). Because FSH is less affected by GnRH, circulating FSH together with low testosterone concentrations may be sufficient to maintain spermatogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results confirm the essential role of testosterone for spermatogenesis and epididymal function but leaves the question open why the changes in semen quality were highly variable between individual stallions despite constant low testosterone concentrations for more than 6 months. A possible explanation might be the different effect of GnRH immunization on pituitary LH and FSH secretion (Garza et al, 1986;Rabb et al, 1990). Because FSH is less affected by GnRH, circulating FSH together with low testosterone concentrations may be sufficient to maintain spermatogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different proteins and coupling techniques have been used (as discussed in the section), but in many cases, much of the resultant antibody production targeted the carrier protein and not the GnRH peptide. Therefore the vaccines required a primary and several booster doses to produce a 6‐month‐long response 21,26,41 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rodents, GnRH immunization led to a decrease of FSH in blood plasma down to non-detectable levels (McLachlan et al 1994a). In other species including sheep, goat, bull and horse, FSH concentrations were decreased to a varying degree but levels that suggest a physiological function were still maintained (Rabb et al 1990, Brown et al 1994, Godfrey et al 1996, Finnerty et al 1998. For the pig it was reported that immunization inhibited LH, whereas plasma and pituitary FSH contents were not affected at all (Awoniyi et al 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%