2019
DOI: 10.3233/bmr-170887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of active versus passive upper extremity neural mobilization combined with mechanical traction and joint mobilization in females with cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Suggests that pain relief can be related to stimulation of blood circulation which decrease muscle tone which may improve ROM, and increase pain threshold and increase superficial tissue temperature, that may stimulate Endorphin secretion, known by the natural pain killers mechanism. The results are consistent with prior studies of Traction in the treatment of CRS [1,8,11,16,17,22,35,37] where reduction of pain intensity and disability were found. Bukhari, et al (2016) [11] studied the effects of Mechanical versus Manual Traction in Manual Physical Therapy combined with segmental mobilization (SM) and exercise therapy (ET) in 36 Patients with CRS along 6 weeks by 3 days per week, results indicate that Mechanical Traction combined with SM and ET was more effectively as compared with manual traction combined with SM and ET in term of pain and disability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Suggests that pain relief can be related to stimulation of blood circulation which decrease muscle tone which may improve ROM, and increase pain threshold and increase superficial tissue temperature, that may stimulate Endorphin secretion, known by the natural pain killers mechanism. The results are consistent with prior studies of Traction in the treatment of CRS [1,8,11,16,17,22,35,37] where reduction of pain intensity and disability were found. Bukhari, et al (2016) [11] studied the effects of Mechanical versus Manual Traction in Manual Physical Therapy combined with segmental mobilization (SM) and exercise therapy (ET) in 36 Patients with CRS along 6 weeks by 3 days per week, results indicate that Mechanical Traction combined with SM and ET was more effectively as compared with manual traction combined with SM and ET in term of pain and disability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This situation is due mainly to a much more comfortable grip and control in the cervical spine than in the lumbar spine, which is a more specific technique. While Ayub et al (2019) combined traction with other treatment forms such as neural mobilization (passive vs. active), none of the treatment methods was found to be superior to the others [ 38 ]. Afzal et al (2019) also compared manual traction, manual opening techniques, and a combination of these in patients with CR, but the effects of both techniques were equally effective in functional outcome [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical radiculopathy, thought to be mechanical, spatial dysfunction, also needs treatment, including movement, both proximally and distally. It has to be mentioned that a small number of papers used clinical tests for assessing functional outcomes [ 38 , 43 , 49 , 54 ]. This is because local pain is not the primary CR and LR problem, but distal dysfunction (e.g., muscle weakness, motor and sensory deficits due to neural malfunction), causing disability, which should always be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations