2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of acute and chronic lamotrigine treatment on basal and stimulated extracellular amino acids in the hippocampus of freely moving rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, lamotrigine was more potent at inhibiting glutamate release evoked by veratridine (IC 50 ∼31 μM; Waldmeier et al 1995) but was unable to inhibit release from cortical synaptosomes evoked by depolarization with potassium chloride (Lingamaneni and Hemmings 1999). In a recent in vivo study, Ahmad et al (2004a) reported that lamotrigine, at therapeutically relevant concentrations, could inhibit an increase in extracellular glutamate induced by veratridine applied via a microdialysis probe to the hippocampus. The inhibitory effect of lamotrigine increased with chronic dosing (21 days), although this could be explained by increases in plasma and brain concentrations of the drug over the first few days of dosing.…”
Section: Glutamate Releasementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, lamotrigine was more potent at inhibiting glutamate release evoked by veratridine (IC 50 ∼31 μM; Waldmeier et al 1995) but was unable to inhibit release from cortical synaptosomes evoked by depolarization with potassium chloride (Lingamaneni and Hemmings 1999). In a recent in vivo study, Ahmad et al (2004a) reported that lamotrigine, at therapeutically relevant concentrations, could inhibit an increase in extracellular glutamate induced by veratridine applied via a microdialysis probe to the hippocampus. The inhibitory effect of lamotrigine increased with chronic dosing (21 days), although this could be explained by increases in plasma and brain concentrations of the drug over the first few days of dosing.…”
Section: Glutamate Releasementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Both riluzole and lamotrigine reduce glutamate release through mechanisms that inactivate voltage-dependent sodium channels (Ahmad et al, 2004;Lees and Leach, 1993;Benoit and Escande, 1991;Hebert et al, 1994), and recent clinical studies of both pharmaceuticals (Zarate et al, 2005;Calabrese et al, 1999) suggest that this regulation of the glutamatergic system is critical in treating bipolar depression. In accordance with the increasing need for providing therapeutics with novel mechanisms (Sanacora et al, 2008), lamotrigine has been more frequently considered as the first-line medication for the depressed phase of BD (reviewed by Fountoulakis et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption was called into question by the demonstrationFin a double-blind, placebo-controlled studyFthat lamotrigine (6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,4-triazine-3,5-diamine) was effective in acute bipolar depression (Calabrese et al, 1999); indeed, lamotrigine is now increasingly accepted as a very effective agent for the depressed phase of bipolar disorder, but its use is limited by its side-effect profile. Lamotrigine is a comparatively novel antiepileptic agent used primarily in the treatment of generalized and partial seizures (Bazil, 2002;Kwan and Brodie, 2001); its mechanism of action is considered to be a reduction in glutamate release following inhibition of Na + channels and consequent neurotransmitter glutamate exocytosis (Ahmad et al, 2004;Lees and Leach, 1993). Riluzole (2-amino-6-trifluoromethoxybenzothiazole), an inhibitor of sodium channel and thus glutamate release, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Bensimon et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%