2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3291-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of acute withdrawal on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice

Abstract: Rationale Re-exposure to ethanol during acute withdrawal might facilitate the transition to alcoholism by enhancing the rewarding effect of ethanol. Objective The conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure was used to test whether ethanol reward is enhanced during acute withdrawal. Methods DBA/2J mice were exposed to an unbiased one-compartment CPP procedure. Ethanol (0.75, 1.0 or 1.5 g/kg IP) was paired with a distinctive floor cue (CS+), whereas saline was paired with a different floor cue (CS−). The W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fidler et al (2011) recently proposed several possible mechanisms related to dependence-enhanced intragastric ethanol self-administration in D2 mice: enhanced ethanol positive reward, reduced aversive effects, or relief of negative consequences associated with dependence/withdrawal. Greater reward valuation by D2 mice following dependence would be consistent with both their greater sensitivity in conditioned place-preference paradigms (Cunningham, Niehus, Malott, & Prather, 1992), as well as the finding that pairing acute withdrawal with acute ethanol enhances conditioned place preference for ethanol in this strain (Dreumont & Cunningham, 2014). Because we used a single-bottle self-administration procedure, we could not directly measure ethanol reward as it is represented by preference between ethanol and a non-rewarding solution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fidler et al (2011) recently proposed several possible mechanisms related to dependence-enhanced intragastric ethanol self-administration in D2 mice: enhanced ethanol positive reward, reduced aversive effects, or relief of negative consequences associated with dependence/withdrawal. Greater reward valuation by D2 mice following dependence would be consistent with both their greater sensitivity in conditioned place-preference paradigms (Cunningham, Niehus, Malott, & Prather, 1992), as well as the finding that pairing acute withdrawal with acute ethanol enhances conditioned place preference for ethanol in this strain (Dreumont & Cunningham, 2014). Because we used a single-bottle self-administration procedure, we could not directly measure ethanol reward as it is represented by preference between ethanol and a non-rewarding solution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Conversely, D2 mice express pronounced physical and emotional vulnerability to ethanol dependence. This vulnerability is manifested as increased incidence of withdrawal-related seizures (Crabbe, Kosobud, Young, & Janowsky, 1983), enhanced conditioned-taste aversion (Risinger & Cunningham, 1998) and ethanol reward (Dreumont & Cunningham, 2014), and relatively greater c-fos expression (compared to B6) within ‘emotional centers’ such as the lateral/basolateral and central amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, hippocampus, and prelimbic cortex (Chen, Reilly, Kozell, Hitzemann, & Buck, 2009). Our finding that D2 mice express enhanced anxiety-like behavior within the light/dark transition assay is entirely consistent with the hypothesis that dependence drives drinking more through mechanisms related to negative affect in this strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no free-choice MA intake studies that have examined the impact of withdrawal period. However, based on alcohol intake studies with DBA/2J (D2) and B6 mice (Cunningham et al, 2013; Dreumont and Cunningham, 2014), we predicted that short acute withdrawal periods within a day between MA access periods would sustain or even enhance MA intake, whereas longer withdrawal periods of days between MA access periods would attenuate MA intake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acute activation of compensatory brain mechanisms directed towards the preservation of homeostasis can elicit acute (conditioned) withdrawal symptoms once the expected drug of abuse is not consumed (conditioned withdrawal [47,48]). Such conditioned withdrawal reactions [49,50,51,52] suggest that contextual cues elicit counteradaptive mechanisms that are specifically directed against the sedative effects of the drug of abuse. Indeed, cessation of chronic consumption of a GABAergic drug is accompanied by conditioned withdrawal symptoms and a strong urge to consume the drug [17,41].…”
Section: Learning Mechanisms and The Neurobiological Correlates Undermentioning
confidence: 99%