2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Added Organic Matter and Water on Soil Carbon Sequestration in an Arid Region

Abstract: It is generally predicted that global warming will stimulate primary production and lead to more carbon (C) inputs to soil. However, many studies have found that soil C does not necessarily increase with increased plant litter input. Precipitation has increased in arid central Asia, and is predicted to increase more, so we tested the effects of adding fresh organic matter (FOM) and water on soil C sequestration in an arid region in northwest China. The results suggested that added FOM quickly decomposed and ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the controls (F0P0), the soil C input–emission balanced was calculated (Table 4). In our prior study about the effects of treatments (FOM and water addition) on the soil organic C pool, it showed that the SOC in soil of F2 treatment plots were slightly higher than in soil of other treatment plots, but the differences were not significant [55]. In this study, the positive C input–emission balance was found in F2 treatment plots under the same water addition regime (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…In contrast to the controls (F0P0), the soil C input–emission balanced was calculated (Table 4). In our prior study about the effects of treatments (FOM and water addition) on the soil organic C pool, it showed that the SOC in soil of F2 treatment plots were slightly higher than in soil of other treatment plots, but the differences were not significant [55]. In this study, the positive C input–emission balance was found in F2 treatment plots under the same water addition regime (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Of the eleven papers that investigated microbial biomass the majority found that microbial biomass increased in response to increased precipitation (e.g., Illeris et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2013;Bell et al, 2014), while three studies found no response (Bi et al, 2012;Lai et al, 2013;Cregger et al, 2014) and two found variable context-dependent results (Cregger et al, 2012;Sherman et al, 2012). Only three of these papers reported responses to reduced precipitation but the results were idiosyncratic (Cregger et al, 2012(Cregger et al, , 2014Sherman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Biotic Responses To In Situ Precipitation Manipulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a). SWC has been regarded as the most important driving factor that controlled soil carbon cycle in the grassland (Lai et al, 2013;Wiesmeier et al, 2013). Many soil processes are affected by SWC and soil water movement, including microbial activity, leaching of minerals and biochemistry cycles (Manzoni et al, 2012).…”
Section: Carbon-water Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, with soil drying out, the ratio of microbial and enzymatic activity decreased , and rest grazing increased the microbial carbon and promoted enrichment of the labile soil carbon pool by enhancing SWC (Shrestha and Stahl, 2008). Secondly, organic matter input to the soil were supplied by root, which was significantly affected by SWC in the natural environment (Jones, 2000;Lai et al, 2013). In addition, the productivity could be improved by the higher availability of plant water in RGG (Su et al, 2005) and as shown here (Figs.…”
Section: Carbon-water Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%