1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00292-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
95
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
95
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results are consistent with other research: Figure 6 shows that an elevated filtration flux, a high TSS concentration and low aeration intensity increase the TMP significantly ( figures 6A, 6C, 6D). This behavior is consistent with the results of Germain et al and Ueda et al (Germain, 2005;Ueda, 1997), who demonstrated that an increase in the permeate flux and a reduction in the aeration rate would cause severe membrane fouling. Also, the filtration of a sticky sludge or a biomass with a high specific filtration resistance increases the fouling process (figures 6B, 6F).…”
Section: 2-influence Of the Smbr Process Variables On Tmp Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The simulation results are consistent with other research: Figure 6 shows that an elevated filtration flux, a high TSS concentration and low aeration intensity increase the TMP significantly ( figures 6A, 6C, 6D). This behavior is consistent with the results of Germain et al and Ueda et al (Germain, 2005;Ueda, 1997), who demonstrated that an increase in the permeate flux and a reduction in the aeration rate would cause severe membrane fouling. Also, the filtration of a sticky sludge or a biomass with a high specific filtration resistance increases the fouling process (figures 6B, 6F).…”
Section: 2-influence Of the Smbr Process Variables On Tmp Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…6 depicts changes in suction pressure with aeration rates. As the aeraton rate increased, the suction pressure was found to decrease gradually from 41 (without aeration) to 31 cmHg (with 0.4 m 3 /min), which is consistent with the result from Ueda (1997). One would expect that no aeration would worsen membrane fouling.…”
Section: Effect Of Aeration Rates On Effluent Mlss Levelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This disparate behavior stems from the slugging phenomenon, whereby large changes in the gas flow have a negligible effect on the velocity of the film that is formed adjacent to the surface of the fiber [211]. Similar plateaus have been observed in submerged HF systems for sewage treatment and drinking-water treatment [191,210]. It has been observed that at high gas flowrates (namely, 40 L/h), a maximum flux was observed, after which the flux started to decline [212].…”
Section: Effect Of Gas Flowratementioning
confidence: 67%
“…It has been reported in many studies that the filtration performance can be improved by controlling the bubbling rate [15,16,209,210]. On the one hand, the critical flux improves in an approximately linear fashion with respect to gas flow in submerged HF systems [100][101][102][103]204].…”
Section: Effect Of Gas Flowratementioning
confidence: 99%