2001
DOI: 10.1076/anec.8.2.81.844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Age and Intentionality on Content Memory and Temporal Memory for Performed Activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Older Canadian adult participants had adequate health literacy skill as measured by the STOFHLA (prose and numeracy scores). The inverse association found between age and STOFHLA scores, most notably for participants between 80-90 years, agrees with previous findings of limited health literacy skills among U.S. adults 85 years and older (Schmitter-Edgecombe & Simpson, 2001;Sliwinski, 1997;Williams, et al, 1995). We propose that the association between age and functional health literacy (STOFHLA) may be more a function of prose than numeracy skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Older Canadian adult participants had adequate health literacy skill as measured by the STOFHLA (prose and numeracy scores). The inverse association found between age and STOFHLA scores, most notably for participants between 80-90 years, agrees with previous findings of limited health literacy skills among U.S. adults 85 years and older (Schmitter-Edgecombe & Simpson, 2001;Sliwinski, 1997;Williams, et al, 1995). We propose that the association between age and functional health literacy (STOFHLA) may be more a function of prose than numeracy skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The authors found that the TBI groups demonstrated both poorer temporal order and content memory for the performed actions when compared to controls. In addition, the TBI groups performed as well on temporal order recall in the incidental instruction condition as in the intentional instruction condition, providing support for the idea that temporal order memory for activities may not be dependent on intentional encoding strategies such as rehearsal (Kausler & Phillips, 1988; Salthouse, Kausler, & Saults, 1988 but see Schmitter-Edgecombe & Simpson, 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Two possible explanations for this contrasting finding are that Schmitter-Edgecombe and Wright (2003) used an incidental instruction condition as compared to an intentional instruction condition, and that their participants were all more than 1 year post injury. It may be that under intentional encoding conditions, intentional encoding strategies like rehearsal can facilitate temporal order memory for activities (Schmitter-Edgecombe & Simpson, 2001), thereby providing a disproportionate advantage for controls who may be better able to use effortful, intentional encoding strategies. It is also possible that recovery of temporal order memory for activities continues past the point we collected the follow-up testing data for the TBI participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis excluded all trials on which any single segment participated in more than one transposition; logically, a segment could only have been transposed with one other segment. Research with serial recall of verbal stimuli has shown that older participants exhibit a heightened tendency to transpose nearest-neighbor items in a series (Maylor et al, 1999; Schmitter-Edgecombe & Simpson, 2001). We therefore focused on nearest-neighbor transpositions in participants’ imitations, that is, cases in which the transposed segments were adjacent to one another in serial order.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%