1995
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of age and schooling on the acquisition of elementary quantitative skills.

Abstract: The influence of school-and age-related variables was examined separately on 2 tasks involving elementary quantitative skills: conservation of number and mental addition. Performance on these tasks was compared by using a cutoff design with 3 groups of kindergarten and Grade 1 children who differed in age but not amount of schooling (grade), in schooling but not age, or in both age and schooling. The effects of age and schooling were distinct. On conservation of number, performance improved as a function of ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
87
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although at the beginning, this type of aggrupation was used with the objective of trying to prevent differences in the formation of the athletes (González, 2007) through an appropriate development and fair competition with equal opportunities (Musch & Grondin, 2001;Gutiérrez, 2013), but what it really provokes is the existence of differences in age and therefore potentially differences in maturation and experience among the members of a same category (Gutiérrez, 2013). Unfortunately, studies confirm that the distribution of athletes to groups by age provokes differences among the athletes at physical (Delorme & Raspaud, 2009), cognitive (Bisanz, Morrison, & Dunn, 1995), motivational (Dixon, Horton, & Weir, 2011) and existential levels (Musch & Grondin, 2001). For this reason, the players born in the first months of the year come to have a kind of advantage over those born later in the competition year (Carling, Le Gall, Reilly, & Williams, 2009;González, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although at the beginning, this type of aggrupation was used with the objective of trying to prevent differences in the formation of the athletes (González, 2007) through an appropriate development and fair competition with equal opportunities (Musch & Grondin, 2001;Gutiérrez, 2013), but what it really provokes is the existence of differences in age and therefore potentially differences in maturation and experience among the members of a same category (Gutiérrez, 2013). Unfortunately, studies confirm that the distribution of athletes to groups by age provokes differences among the athletes at physical (Delorme & Raspaud, 2009), cognitive (Bisanz, Morrison, & Dunn, 1995), motivational (Dixon, Horton, & Weir, 2011) and existential levels (Musch & Grondin, 2001). For this reason, the players born in the first months of the year come to have a kind of advantage over those born later in the competition year (Carling, Le Gall, Reilly, & Williams, 2009;González, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, changes in memory skills have been viewed as a by-product of learning to read as well as a consequence of greater environmental demands for deliberate memory (Rogoff, 1981). In our own research, we have examined potential influences of schooling on growth of syntactic knowledge (Ferreira & Morrison, 1994), development of memory and causal reasoning in narrative comprehension and production (Varnhagen, Morrison, & Everall, 1994), and changes in arithmetic computational skills and number conservation (Bisanz, Morrison, & Dunn, 1995). The present article focuses on the influence of schooling on growth of memory and language skills.…”
Section: Focus Of Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children of African-American descent who were thought of being in the preoperational level of cognitive development performed poorer in mathematics compared to children of Caucasian decent (Cooper, & Schleser, 2006). Additionally, although conservation capacity of most children improves along with age (Bisanz, Dunn, & Morrison 1995), it is not a direct attribute of age (Ginsberg & Opper, 1969). In effect, the recognised assumption that the relationship between the conservation task and the quality of reasoning among children is not at all as simple as Piaget's theory presumed (Baucal, & Stepanović, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%