2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of age and spectral shaping on perception and neural representation of stop consonant stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
87
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased N1 and/or P2 latencies have been associated with a general slowing of neuronal processing, as well as changes in excitatory and inhibitory processes, which can result in decreased neuronal synchrony or temporal jitter within the auditory pathway. With regard to amplitudes, some studies report similar N1-P2 amplitudes for younger and older subjects (Barrett et al, 1987;Brown et al, 1983;Picton et al, 1984;Tremblay et al, 2004), whereas others report an age-related increase in amplitudes (Anderer et al, 1996;Harkrider et al, 2005;Pfefferbaum et al, 1980). Like the N1-P2, age-related increases in amplitude have been reported for other cortical potentials (Boettcher et al, 2001;Woods et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Increased N1 and/or P2 latencies have been associated with a general slowing of neuronal processing, as well as changes in excitatory and inhibitory processes, which can result in decreased neuronal synchrony or temporal jitter within the auditory pathway. With regard to amplitudes, some studies report similar N1-P2 amplitudes for younger and older subjects (Barrett et al, 1987;Brown et al, 1983;Picton et al, 1984;Tremblay et al, 2004), whereas others report an age-related increase in amplitudes (Anderer et al, 1996;Harkrider et al, 2005;Pfefferbaum et al, 1980). Like the N1-P2, age-related increases in amplitude have been reported for other cortical potentials (Boettcher et al, 2001;Woods et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Moreover, Tremblay et al (2004) reported that N1 latencies were prolonged in older subjects in response to changes in the temporal cues of speech stimuli, but not to the onset of a simple pure-tone stimulus, and hypothesized that age-related changes in N1 may be due to reduced neural synchrony and not simply a result of age-related delays in neural conduction times. Similarly, Harkrider et al (2005) observed that P2 latencies were delayed in older subjects in response to changes in the spectral cues of speech stimuli and suggested that prolonged latencies in older listeners may be due to reduced neural synchrony in response to changes in spectral cues. Bertoli et al (2005) observed similar increases in P2 latencies in older normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults as compared to younger adults.…”
Section: Effect Of Age On P1 N1 and P2 Response Latencies And Amplimentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, although P1-N1-P2 thresholds were significantly larger at 500 Hz for older than younger subjects, P1 and N1 amplitudes appeared larger (not smaller) in older than in younger subjects, although differences did not reach statistical significance. Several studies have reported age-related increases in P1 amplitudes (Tremblay et al, 2004) and N1 amplitudes (Harkrider et al, 2005;Harris et al, 2007). Additionally, Boettcher et al (2002) reported increased amplitudes of the FMFR in older than younger subjects using a frequency-modulated sinusoid with a 500-Hz carrier frequency.…”
Section: Effect Of Age On P1 N1 and P2 Response Latencies And Amplimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations