2018
DOI: 10.5546/aap.2018.eng.248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of age of diagnosis and dietary compliance on growth parameters of patients with celiac disease

Abstract: Delay in CD diagnosis negatively affected both the height and weight and other growth parameters. GFD compliance positively affected the patients' all growth parameters, especially weight and BMI z-score.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the growth trajectory must be used as a marker throughout the diagnostic process for CD [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. Our results agree with the study by Comba et al [ 66 ] on the level of development at the time of diagnosis in a sample of 73 paediatric CD patients, 35 (47.9%) of whom were short for their age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For this reason, the growth trajectory must be used as a marker throughout the diagnostic process for CD [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. Our results agree with the study by Comba et al [ 66 ] on the level of development at the time of diagnosis in a sample of 73 paediatric CD patients, 35 (47.9%) of whom were short for their age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…An early diagnosis and proper dietary regimen continuation minimize the risk of a compromised final height. Accordingly, Comba et al (33) observed that patients who received the diagnosis of CD after the age of 6 had a significantly lower z-score for BMI, height and weight, as compared to children diagnosed at a younger age, indicating that when CD diagnosis is posed after puberty, the chances for growth catch-up are lower.…”
Section: Clinical Manifestationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our population, the mean diagnosis age was 6.1 years, which is between the age of the Marrakech series (5.8 years) [ 24 ], the Tunisian series (5.9 years) [ 36 ], the age in Mediterranean countries (5.9 years) [ 37 ], and between the mean diagnosis age of Turkish children (6.4 years) [ 38 ]. Nevertheless, our diagnosis age is high compared to that reported by Boudraa et al (3.6 years) [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%