BackgroundExercise is essential for patients with heart failure as it leads to a reduction in
morbidity and mortality as well as improved functional capacity and oxygen uptake
(⩒O2). However, the need for an experienced physiologist and the
cost of the exam may render the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) unfeasible. Thus,
the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and step test (ST) may be alternatives for exercise
prescription.ObjectiveThe aim was to correlate heart rate (HR) during the 6MWT and ST with HR at the
anaerobic threshold (HRAT) and peak HR (HRP) obtained on the
CPET.MethodsEighty-three patients (58 ± 11 years) with heart failure (NYHA class II) were
included and all subjects had optimized medication for at least 3 months. Evaluations
involved CPET (⩒O2, HRAT, HRP), 6MWT
(HR6MWT) and ST (HRST).ResultsThe participants exhibited severe ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction: 31
± 7%) and low peak ⩒O2 (15.2 ± 3.1
mL.kg-1.min-1). HRP (113 ± 19 bpm) was higher
than HRAT (92 ± 14 bpm; p < 0.05) and HR6MWT (94
± 13 bpm; p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between
HRP and HRST. Moreover, a strong correlation was found between
HRAT and HR6MWT (r = 0.81; p < 0.0001), and between
HRP and HRST (r = 0.89; p < 0.0001).ConclusionThese findings suggest that, in the absence of CPET, exercise prescription can be
performed by use of 6MWT and ST, based on HR6MWT and HRST