2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Aging and Dual-Task Demands on the Comprehension of Less Expected Sentence Continuations: Evidence From Pupillometry

Abstract: Prior studies on language processing in aging have shown that older adults experience integration difficulties for contextually unpredictable target words (as indicated by low cloze probabilities in prior ratings), and that such comprehension difficulties are more likely to occur under more demanding processing conditions (e.g., dual-task situations). However, these effects have primarily been demonstrated for conditions when cloze probability of the linguistic stimuli was very low. The question we asked here … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this is a valid concern, we believe that it does capture an important aspect of driving, namely routine steering performance while driving. There is indeed considerable research showing the utility of this task for studying driving performance (Demberg, 2013 ; Häuser et al, 2019 ; Rajan et al, 2016 ; Reichel et al, 2014 ; Vogels et al, 2018 ). There is also considerable research recognizing the importance of combining studies of natural driving with better controlled lab-based studies in order to establish a complete picture of the factors underlying driving performance (Boyle & Lee, 2010 ; Bruck et al, 2020 ; Caird et al, 2014a , 2014b ; Guo, 2019 ; Underwood et al, 2011 ; Wijayaratna et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this is a valid concern, we believe that it does capture an important aspect of driving, namely routine steering performance while driving. There is indeed considerable research showing the utility of this task for studying driving performance (Demberg, 2013 ; Häuser et al, 2019 ; Rajan et al, 2016 ; Reichel et al, 2014 ; Vogels et al, 2018 ). There is also considerable research recognizing the importance of combining studies of natural driving with better controlled lab-based studies in order to establish a complete picture of the factors underlying driving performance (Boyle & Lee, 2010 ; Bruck et al, 2020 ; Caird et al, 2014a , 2014b ; Guo, 2019 ; Underwood et al, 2011 ; Wijayaratna et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent measure is the average distance between the driver-controlled cursor and the moving target. We chose this task because it provides a good proxy of a critical aspect of basic routine driving, namely continuously controlling the lateral position of the vehicle while driving, because it provides temporally fine-grain data about driving performance, and because it was previously used to investigate the interference between driving and language (Demberg, 2013 ; Häuser et al, 2019 ; Rajan et al, 2016 ; Vogels et al, 2020 ). This allowed us to measure the effects of a concurrent interactive verbal task at a high temporal resolution and thus provide a critical test of a psycholinguistic explanation of the well-documented interference between conversation and driving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicated that changes in the COP displacement were due to dual-tasking from the experimental design. Performing the hand task in standing was a dual-task to postural control, which has been widely studied and shown difficulties of postural adjustments in the elderly [28,29]. The larger COP displacement and fast sway were observed in the medial-lateral direction, but not in the anterior-posterior direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been known that under dual-task conditions, the pupil initially dilates and then constricts, in parallel with behavioral results, that is, performance improvement followed by deterioration (Kahneman et al, 1967;Shiga & Ohkubo, 1978). Nowadays it is considered a stable finding that the pupil constricts in dual-task conditions (compared to a single-task baseline), while performance drops (Häuser et al, 2019;Karatekin et al, 2004;Recarte & Nunes, 2000;Recarte et al, 2008;Tapper et al, 2021). Two alternative interpretations have been proposed to explain these results: The first one posits that pupil constriction indicates capacity constraints due to cognitive overload (Kahneman, 1973;Tapper et al, 2021;Zekveld & Kramer, 2014;Zekveld et al, 2011).…”
Section: Pupil Sizementioning
confidence: 99%