2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aging on slowing of motor-response generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

21
93
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(38 reference statements)
21
93
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite socioeconomic homogeneity of our current study participants, we found that educational attainment was related to timed- Consequently, timed-based measurements may detect the common factor of age-related slowing in motor response [35].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Despite socioeconomic homogeneity of our current study participants, we found that educational attainment was related to timed- Consequently, timed-based measurements may detect the common factor of age-related slowing in motor response [35].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Recent EEG studies have already indicated that information processing related to anticipation and preparation of a motor response changes during healthy aging (Golob et al 2005;Sterr and Dean 2008). Even though evidence suggests that older adults need stronger (amplitude enhancement) and longer (prolongation of the motor-related potential) activation of the contralateral motor cortex to trigger motor responses (Falkenstein et al 2006;Yordanova et al 2004), it still remains unclear whether these observations reflect deficits in movement preparation or response-generation processes or both. The present study aimed to bridge this gap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent EEG studies have shown that brain activity related to anticipation, preparation, and/or generation of motor responses is changed in healthy aging (Falkenstein et al 2006;Golob et al 2005;Roggeveen et al 2007;Sailer et al 2000;Sterr and Dean 2008;Yordanova et al 2004). More specifically, Sterr and Dean (2008) showed that increased negativity of contingent negative variations (CNVs) in younger individuals during the preparatory period of a precued choice reaction time (CRT) task was associated with higher recruitment of the frontal brain network and lateralized activation over motor regions, whereas these trends were not seen in older individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations