1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf02372536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Al on nitrogen (NH 4 + and NO 3 − ) uptake, nitrate reductase activity and proton release in two sorghum cultivars differing in Al tolerance

Abstract: After growth for 17 to 36 days on nutrient solutions with NH4NO3 as nitrogen source (pH 4.2) dry matter of sorghum genotype SC0283 was much less affected by A1 (1.5 and 3.0 ppm) than that of genotype NB9040.In the absence of A1 both cultivars released protons into the nutrient solution as a result of an excess of cationic nutrients taken up. When AI was present, this proton efflux per unit dry weight increased drastically, especially with the sensitive genotype NB9040. Chemical analysis of plant material and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results on Al effects on proton extrusion measured in vivo on Triticum aestivum roots are somewhat contradictory because Kinraide (1988) reported undiminished proton extrusion, while Miyasaka et al (1989) observed inhibition of net H"" efflux in an Al-sensitive (but not in an Al-tolerant) cultivar. In other in vivo experiments, Al increased net H^ efflux from Zea mays roots (Bennet et al, 1987) and also in Sorghum bicolor concomitantly with increased NH4"â nd decreased NO3" uptake (Keltjens & Ulden, 1987). Even though in experiments in vivo the composition of nutrient solution in which plants were grown might have masked the real effect of Al on H^-ATPase activity by influencing cation/anion uptake ratio, it appears that the hypothesis of Al interference with wall acidification through direct effect on H"^-ATPases that would result in reduction of the amount of H^ ions pumped into the apoplasm may not be valid.…”
Section: Cell Wall Extensibilitymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Results on Al effects on proton extrusion measured in vivo on Triticum aestivum roots are somewhat contradictory because Kinraide (1988) reported undiminished proton extrusion, while Miyasaka et al (1989) observed inhibition of net H"" efflux in an Al-sensitive (but not in an Al-tolerant) cultivar. In other in vivo experiments, Al increased net H^ efflux from Zea mays roots (Bennet et al, 1987) and also in Sorghum bicolor concomitantly with increased NH4"â nd decreased NO3" uptake (Keltjens & Ulden, 1987). Even though in experiments in vivo the composition of nutrient solution in which plants were grown might have masked the real effect of Al on H^-ATPase activity by influencing cation/anion uptake ratio, it appears that the hypothesis of Al interference with wall acidification through direct effect on H"^-ATPases that would result in reduction of the amount of H^ ions pumped into the apoplasm may not be valid.…”
Section: Cell Wall Extensibilitymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A similar increase in the amount of Al per unit root length was observed only in the sensitive cv. This form of expression takes account of the change in root system morphology and reflects more closely the surface phenomena associated with Al toxicity (Keltjens & van Ulden, 1987). The Al content increase per unit root length observed in the sensitive cv, as root biomass per unit root length decreases slightly (see Fig.…”
Section: Differences Between Al-sensitive and Al-tolerant Cvsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Per species 105 seedlings were selected and equally divided over seven 50-L containers filled with a solution containing (mM): K + 1.35; Ca 2+ 0.2; Mg 2+ 0.4; NH + 2.0; NOj-2.0; SOt-1.0; H2PO s 0.15; C1 0.4; FeEDTA 0.08 and additional micronutrients (Keltjens and van Ulden, 1987). To each container 0,5,10,15,20,25 or 30 mg L J Al was added as A1C13.…”
Section: Experiments 1 Effects Of Al On Growth Chemical Composition mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect effects on forest trees may result from dissolution of inorganic Ai at low soil pH (Hutchinson and Havas, 1980). A1 phytotoxicity has been shown with many different plant species (G6ransson and Eldhuset, 1987;Horst and G6ppel, 1986;Jarvis and Hatch, 1987;Keltjens and van Ulden, 1987;McCormick and Steiner, 1978). Although A1 enrichment in above-ground plant parts is usually low even at high external AI levels, aluminium can accumulate in and on roots to extremely high levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation