2016
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1153704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of amalgamations: evidence from Swiss municipalities

Abstract: Many OECD countries have amalgamated their municipalities during the last couple of decades. For decisions concerning future territorial rescaling, it is crucial to augment the previously inconclusive evaluative knowledge of the effects of mergers. This paper examines the effects of amalgamations conducted between 1998 and 2009 in the areas of public service delivery, local finance, administrative staff, municipal autonomy and local democracy. The data are obtained from two comprehensive surveys of all local s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
39
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, research on the following several key points is limited. First, many studies have focused on the effect of mergers among public bureaus performing the same set of services and functions, with the most common subject being amalgamation of multiple municipalities (e.g., Blom-Hansen et al, 2016;Feiock & Carr, 2000;Hanes, 2015;Holzer et al, 2009;Kjaer, Hjelmar, & Leth Olsen, 2010;Leland & Thurmaier, 2005;Steiner & Kaiser, 2017;Suzuki & Sakuwa, 2016). Insights from these studies, however, may have limited value in understanding mergers among public organizations performing different sets of services or functions (Hult, 1987).…”
Section: Administrative Reorganization and Saliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research on the following several key points is limited. First, many studies have focused on the effect of mergers among public bureaus performing the same set of services and functions, with the most common subject being amalgamation of multiple municipalities (e.g., Blom-Hansen et al, 2016;Feiock & Carr, 2000;Hanes, 2015;Holzer et al, 2009;Kjaer, Hjelmar, & Leth Olsen, 2010;Leland & Thurmaier, 2005;Steiner & Kaiser, 2017;Suzuki & Sakuwa, 2016). Insights from these studies, however, may have limited value in understanding mergers among public organizations performing different sets of services or functions (Hult, 1987).…”
Section: Administrative Reorganization and Saliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For certain public goods, unit costs can be lowered with production at a larger scale (Bikker and Van der Linde 2016). A merger would thus allow municipalities to save costs (Steiner and Kaiser 2017 voters ultimately base their decision on. In the Swiss discourse on municipal mergers, the argument is very prominent among merger advocates and might thus have a profound influence on local constituencies' decisions: Local representatives of a municipality involved in a merger will likely use these arguments in favor of a merger that they coinitiated -in case the argument fits the situation of their municipality.…”
Section: Functional Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Steiner and Kaiser () also provide insights on the effects of local amalgamations in Switzerland. However, the data quality of their study is not high enough to be reliable for assessing changes in turnout rates over time. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%