2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ambient temperature on a quasi-static axial-crush configuration response of thin-wall, steel box components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the research on the crashworthiness behavior of thin-walled metal tubes mainly focuses on room temperature; however, the crushing deformation of thin-walled metallic tubes is sensitive to temperature [29]. Dipaolo [30] investigated the impact of ambient temperature on the crushing behavior of square tubes. The results revealed that the loading and energy absorption capability of the secondary folded phase are significantly affected by ambient temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the research on the crashworthiness behavior of thin-walled metal tubes mainly focuses on room temperature; however, the crushing deformation of thin-walled metallic tubes is sensitive to temperature [29]. Dipaolo [30] investigated the impact of ambient temperature on the crushing behavior of square tubes. The results revealed that the loading and energy absorption capability of the secondary folded phase are significantly affected by ambient temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental conditions of engineering structures in the range of -40 o C to -80 o C are associated with the Arctic region where the average ambient temperature is -40 o C in winter season, and the lowest temperature is reported to be -68 o C, or exposure to low temperatures sometimes after liquefied gases are released and evaporated. Experimental studies of structural strength at low temperature conditions are found in the literature (Dipaolo and Tom 2009, Paik et al 2011, Kim et al 2016), but most of them have used small-scale physical models, and full-scale physical testing is rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the current knowledge, there are only few research topics which have considered the temperature and phase transformation effects on the axial crush response of hollow structures based on a metastable austenitic steel . DiPaolo and Tom investigated the performance of thin‐walled AISI 316 and AISI 304 steel box components under axial compressive loading at “vehicle design temperatures” ranging from −46 to 93 °C . Their deformation behavior was characterized by a progressive folding mode initiated by an initial trigger or collapse load.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their deformation behavior was characterized by a progressive folding mode initiated by an initial trigger or collapse load. In the case of the AISI 304 variants, the variation in test temperature caused noticeable changes in martensite distribution, the level of the load‐displacement curves, the movement of folding lines as well as the effective crushing distance and the energy absorption capability …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%