2016
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of an interdependent group contingency on engagement in physical education

Abstract: We examined whether a group contingency increased engagement during elementary school physical education sessions. The intervention employed procedures (explicit instruction, goal setting, and reinforcement) drawn from the first tier of classwide function-related intervention teams (CW-FIT; Wills et al., 2009). Results showed salutary increases in engagement that corresponded with the teacher's implementation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study extends previous research by evaluating the game during PE classes, instead of recess, and over longer periods of time (26‐41 min instead of 13‐16 min). As mentioned previously, simply providing the opportunity to be active, such as in a PE class, does not necessarily result in students being as active as they could be (Fogel et al, ; Hirsch et al, ; Sallis et al, ; Shayne et al, ). That was the case in the current study, as participants were more active (took more steps) when the Step it UP!…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current study extends previous research by evaluating the game during PE classes, instead of recess, and over longer periods of time (26‐41 min instead of 13‐16 min). As mentioned previously, simply providing the opportunity to be active, such as in a PE class, does not necessarily result in students being as active as they could be (Fogel et al, ; Hirsch et al, ; Sallis et al, ; Shayne et al, ). That was the case in the current study, as participants were more active (took more steps) when the Step it UP!…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, although research suggests that PE classes provide critical opportunities for children to be active at school (Madsen, Gosliner, Woodward-Lopez, & Crawford, 2009), students are not always as active as they could be during those We thank Jesse Bober, Alex McCurdy, Kelly Roughgarden, Emily Sackett, and Nathan Tomaneng for their assistance in the conduct of this study. classes (Fogel, Mitenberger, Graves, & Koehler, 2010;Hirsch, Healy, Judge, & Lloyd, 2016;Sallis et al, 1997;Shayne, Fogel, Miltenberger, & Koehler, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group contingencies, which are typically designed to administer a consequence to a group based on the behavior of the individuals within the group (Litow & Pumroy, ), have been shown to be effective in managing a variety of challenging behaviors, such as disruptive behaviors, negative social interactions, and poor academic performance (Maggin, Johnson, Chafouleas, Ruberto, & Berggren, ). Interdependent group contingencies are those in which the behavior of all students within a group must meet or exceed a predetermined criteria, and the reinforcer is delivered to all members of the group (Groves, & Austin, ; Hirsch, Healy, Judge, & Lloyd, ; Litow & Pumroy, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although preference assessments are frequently used to inform preference within individual reinforcement contingencies (Kodak, Fisher, Paden, & Dickes, 2013;Krentz, Miltenberger, & Valbuena, 2016), such procedures are rarely described in the literature for identification of potential reinforcers for use in a group contingency (e.g., Good Behavior Game). When preference is assessed within a group setting, it is often done through use of reward surveys with limited detail regarding selection and delivery of preferred stimuli (e.g., Hirsch, Healy, Judge, & Lloyd, 2016;Lannie & McCurdy, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%