Effects of an intervention program for female victims of intimate partner violence on psychological symptoms and perceived social support

Abstract

BackgroundResearch has documented severe mental health problems in female victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Therefore, providing effective treatment is pivotal. Few studies have investigated the effects of intervention programs on reducing the harmful consequences of IPV.ObjectiveThe present study examined the effects of a specific three-phase intervention program for female victims of IPV on psychological symptoms (PTSD, anxiety, and depression) and perceived social support. Given that many of the women dropped out before and during the intervention program, potential differences in initial levels of psychological symptoms, perceived social support, as well as descriptive variables were explored between the women who completed the whole program and the groups of women who dropped out prematurely.MethodThe initial sample consisted of 212 female victims of IPV. Symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and level of perceived social support were measured with validated scales before the start of the intervention and after completion of each treatment phase.ResultsResults showed a significant effect of the intervention program on reducing psychological symptoms and increasing levels of perceived social support. Effect sizes ranged from medium to very high. Significant positive effects were found for each of the treatment phases. There were no significant differences between the women who completed the whole program and those women who dropped out prematurely in terms of initial level of symptoms and perceived social support as well as descriptive characteristics.ConclusionsSpecifically developed intervention programs for female victims of IPV are effective in reducing the harmful personal consequences of IPV. Future studies should consider employing controlled study designs and address the issue of high drop out rates found in intervention studies.

‘We don’t see because we don’t ask’: Qualitative exploration of service users’ and health professionals’ views regarding a psychosocial intervention targeting pregnant women experiencing domestic and family violence

“…Considering the time and resource constraints, and evidence from past studies demonstrating the significant effects of single session therapy (SST) in improving the mental health and safety behaviours of abused women [37,38], SST is considered a pragmatic and the best option. In addition, interventions requiring multiple interactions with women was pointed out as an important reason for high drop-out rates [39] and low attendance rates were seen in subsequent sessions [14,40].…”

A decennial review of psychotraumatology: what did we learn and where are we going?

“…These recent advances certainly open up new clinical perspectives, but also underscore the need for a better understanding of the driving forces in the link between social support and mental health in the aftermath of trauma. New and promising perspectives include the role of oxytocin in social relationships and bonding after trauma (Olff, 2012;Olff et al, 2014), although the neurobiology behind social support, and e. g. the role of sex/gender still is far from understood (Engel et al, subm) and the development of interventions for victims of violence that aim to increase levels of social support (Hansen, Eriksen, & Elklit, 2014). It seems that social interactions cannot be fully understood from a purely individual perspective, and new contributions highlight the need for a societal or ecological approach (Ajduković, 2013;Biruski, Ajdukovic, & Stanic, 2014;Bryant, 2016;Maercker & Hecker, 2016).…”

The coMforT study of a trauma-informed mindfulness intervention for women who have experienced domestic violence and abuse: a protocol for an intervention refinement and individually randomized parallel feasibility trial

“…Resource questionnaire (bespoke) x for women who have experienced DVA [27,28] up to 33% of the consented and randomized participants are expected to drop out before the start of the mindfulness group/control intervention. Therefore, 54 will be randomized in order to be left with 36 who will be allocated to the intervention or control arm.…”