1994
DOI: 10.1017/s0954102094000052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of an oil spill on the soft-bottom macrofauna of Arthur Harbour, Antarctica compared with long-term natural change

Abstract: The macroinfauna at depths 30–115 m was sampled in March–April 1989, c. two months after an oil spill that resulted from the grounding of the Bahia Paraiso. Stations consisted of the oil-spill site and a comparable control location, and two historical sites previously sampled in 1971. The historical sites were located at two distinct points along a known continuum of increasing physical stability with depth, attributed to disturbances from glacial calving. Macroinfaunal assemblages at most stations were charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced sedimentation allows greater light penetration and causes minimal smothering, so that the seabed supports a diverse community of plants and animals, including suspension feeders and predators. There is some evidence that this model is applicable to benthic communities adjacent to Antarctic glaciers (Hyland et al 1994), but there are currently very few field observations relating to sedimentation effects and no field manipulations of sedimentation rates.…”
Section: Sedimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced sedimentation allows greater light penetration and causes minimal smothering, so that the seabed supports a diverse community of plants and animals, including suspension feeders and predators. There is some evidence that this model is applicable to benthic communities adjacent to Antarctic glaciers (Hyland et al 1994), but there are currently very few field observations relating to sedimentation effects and no field manipulations of sedimentation rates.…”
Section: Sedimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in benthic community structure are likely to vary considerably from place to place, as they do now, but for those sites subjected to increased disturbance of any form some generalisations can be made. Perhaps crucially, from the limited number of reports available, it seems that the same suite of species (this is particularly true for polychaetes) are associated with early stages of postdisturbance recovery, regardless whether the initial disturbance was from ice scouring (Gerdes et al 2003, Smale et al 2007a, anchor ice (Lenihan and Oliver 1995), sedimentation (Hyland et al 1994) or pollution (Lenihan andOliver 1995, Conlan et al 2004). Thus, these same circum-Antarctic pioneers are likely to become dominant at sites where disturbance pressures intensify.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, some predictions concerning the response of benthos to changing sedimentation rates and disturbance frequencies at retreating glacier termini can be tentatively made. Assemblages proximal to retreating ice fronts are very likely to be species poor and characterised by short-lived mobile taxa as a result of high sediment deposition, freshwater inflow and ice disturbance intensity (Syvitski et al 1989, Hyland et al 1994. As glaciers retreat, sediment deposition within a few kilometres of the ice front remains high, and the benthos is held at a relatively early successional stage.…”
Section: Future Scenarios and Likely Benthic Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a larger proportion of animals in the top 5 cm of sediment vs. deeper (5-10 cm) at stations further from the wellhead, and communities were significantly different among impact areas in the surface sediments but not the deeper sediments. Dorvilleidae, a polychaete family often associated with hydrocarbons (Hyland et al, 1994;Washburn et al, 2016), was responsible for the largest amount of dissimilarity between stations close to the wellhead and further away. Several other taxa were classified as sensitive or tolerant to the deepsea blowout by comparing their distributions among impact and nonimpact zones.…”
Section: Soft-bottom Community Responsementioning
confidence: 99%