2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Hospitalized Children and Teenagers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our revision confirms that AAIs are a suitable intervention in pediatrics’ wards. Compared to the previous review of Feng et al (2021) , here we analyzed different types of AAIs, including also activities, in addition to dog-assisted therapies. Data overall suggest that, when testing AAI efficacy, physiological indicators are more variable and less reliable than psychological and emotional measures ( Khan and Farrag, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our revision confirms that AAIs are a suitable intervention in pediatrics’ wards. Compared to the previous review of Feng et al (2021) , here we analyzed different types of AAIs, including also activities, in addition to dog-assisted therapies. Data overall suggest that, when testing AAI efficacy, physiological indicators are more variable and less reliable than psychological and emotional measures ( Khan and Farrag, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children’s hospitals are an elective setting where AAIs could be successfully employed, as indicated by an increasing number of studies ( Kaminski et al, 2002 ; Barker et al, 2015 ; Abrahamson et al, 2016 ; Uglow, 2019 ). Although AAI effectiveness has been examined by previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses ( Urbanski and Lazenby, 2012 ; Chur-Hansen et al, 2014 ; Gilmer et al, 2016 ; Lundqvist et al, 2017 ; Waite et al, 2018 ; Tripodi et al, 2019 ; Feng et al, 2021 ), the focus of these studies was not always on the hospital setting or, alternatively, it was limited to a specific medical condition (such as pediatric oncology). Furthermore, they were limited to randomized controlled studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychometric anxiety assessment has been predominantly assessed using STAI-CH (State-Trait anxiety inventory for children) in different healthcare settings (Feng et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Secondary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AAI is an emerging area in the field of psychosocial intervention. Several meta-analyses [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] and review studies [ 24 , 25 ] have demonstrated the positive effects of AAIs in the educational and healthcare contexts. AAIs have been used in the treatment of children and adolescents with learning disabilities, autism, people with serious illnesses (HIV virus, multiple sclerosis, cancer, and in palliative care), adolescents and adults with psychiatric problems, people with disabilities, people with aphasia or other language problems, elderly people with depressive symptoms or with Alzheimer’s disease, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to this human–animal bond, there is evidence that interacting with animals reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression [ 32 ], alleviates pain [ 33 ] and improves physiological markers of well-being and response to stress [ 21 ]. Interaction with animals has been associated with a reduction in systolic blood pressure and an increase in diastolic blood pressure [ 21 ], a reduction in blood pressure [ 34 ], an increase in oxytocin secretion [ 35 ] and reductions in levels of cortisol [ 36 ], epinephrine and norepinephrine, and cardiopulmonary pressure [ 37 ]. Human–animal interactions have also proved useful in the hospital setting where they have been associated with reduced stress levels in hospitalized patients and in those undergoing surgery [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%