2008
DOI: 10.1021/cm800696h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Annealing and Doping on Nanostructured Bismuth Telluride Thick Films

Abstract: Bismuth telluride is the state-of-the-art thermoelectric (TE) material for cooling applications with a figure of merit of ∼1 at 300 K. There is a need for the development of TE materials based on the concept of thick films for miniaturized devices due to mechanical and manufacturing constraints for the thermoelement dimensions. We reported earlier a method for the fabrication of high-quality nanostructured bismuth telluride thick films with thickness from 100 to 350 µm based on electrochemical deposition techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 19 ] The results indicated good control over the fi lms' compositions, but satisfactory control of the morphology and thermoelectric performance was not reported until later works exhibited Seebeck coeffi cients up to 180 μ V K − 1 after annealing up to 300 ° C for about 1h in argon atmosphere. [ 20 ] Potentiostatic electrodeposition from electrolytes based on nitric acid with tartaric acid added in order to increase the solubility of Sb in the aqueous solutions was reported by Xiao et al [ 21 ] Works by Tittes et al [ 22 ] and in 2008 by Li et al [ 23 ] report the successful deposition of (Bi x Sb 1−x ) 2 Te 3 fi lms , but they lack the thermoelectric characterization of the deposited materials. Nedelcu et al and Li et al [ 24 , 25 ] reported (Bi x Sb 1−x ) 2 Te 3 fi lms with Seebeck coefficients of + 150 μ V K − 1 and + 119 μ V K − 1 and power factors of 322 μ W K − 2 m − 1 and 112 μ W K − 2 m − 1 , respectively.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 19 ] The results indicated good control over the fi lms' compositions, but satisfactory control of the morphology and thermoelectric performance was not reported until later works exhibited Seebeck coeffi cients up to 180 μ V K − 1 after annealing up to 300 ° C for about 1h in argon atmosphere. [ 20 ] Potentiostatic electrodeposition from electrolytes based on nitric acid with tartaric acid added in order to increase the solubility of Sb in the aqueous solutions was reported by Xiao et al [ 21 ] Works by Tittes et al [ 22 ] and in 2008 by Li et al [ 23 ] report the successful deposition of (Bi x Sb 1−x ) 2 Te 3 fi lms , but they lack the thermoelectric characterization of the deposited materials. Nedelcu et al and Li et al [ 24 , 25 ] reported (Bi x Sb 1−x ) 2 Te 3 fi lms with Seebeck coefficients of + 150 μ V K − 1 and + 119 μ V K − 1 and power factors of 322 μ W K − 2 m − 1 and 112 μ W K − 2 m − 1 , respectively.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the thermal treatment of as deposited samples can achieve signifi cant improvements due to a decrease in structural defects. [ 23 ] In this work, samples deposited over a wide potential range are annealed in He atmosphere during in situ XRD measurements for structural analysis. In order to further improve the thermoelectric performance of the fi lms, they were annealed for ≥ 60 h at 250 ° C in an equilibrium Te atmosphere, since this treatment proved its ability to refi ne the ratio of V-VI elements in semiconductors.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last few years, there have been many reports on the preparation of these materials in nanocrystalline form, using techniques, such as electrochemical deposition, [9][10][11] hydro/ solvothermal synthesis, 12,13 colloidal processing [14][15][16] and microwave irradiation. 17,18 These methods for synthesizing nanostructured materials generally require prolonged heating or complex apparatus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, when measuring the Seebeck coefficient of thermoelectric thin films, we found that the inverse method using deconvolution reveals the difficulties in recovering to the original signal. Li et al [23] showed that the temperature affecting zone can also heat the material of the substrate, yielding an integrated Seebeck coefficient of both the sample and substrate. However, no report has provided a suitable solution to compensate for the additional Seebeck signal distortion caused by substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%