“…TMG has been used in several studies (Table 4)54,55,60 as a useful tool in the prevention of injuries which may have great potential to improve the prevention and management of musculoskeletal injuries in athletes 6Table 4Characteristics of the studies that assessed injuries prevention and rehabilitationStudy (year) | Sample (n) | Mean Age ± SD | Injury | Muscle Group | Results | Conclusions |
Álvarez-Diaz et al60 | 40 competitive Soccer players | 22.3±6.9 | ACLR | VM, VL, RF, ST, BF, GM and GL | ↓ Ts and Tr for VL, Tc for RF and Tc and Dm for BF in both sides ↓Tc for VL, ST and GM, Tr for GL and Td for GL in injured side ↑Tr for VM and Ts for Gm in injured side ↓Tr for RF and Td for BF uninjured side ↑% SM in VM, VL, RF, and GM | ↑ resistance to fatigue in VL, VM and RF in both sides ↑ Muscle contraction velocity and tone in BF, VL, VM and RF in both sides Changes in gastrocnemius only in the injury side ↑% SM between both sides |
Alvarez-Diaz et al61 | 40 Competitive male soccer players | 22.3±6.8 | ACL | VM, VL, RF, ST, BF, GM and GL | ↑Tc for VM, VL, RF ↑Tc and Dm for BF ↑Tc, Tr and Dm and ↓Ts for GM for GM ↑Tc for VM, VL, RF, ST, BF | The vastbmajority of TMG parameters were higher in the injured compared to the control group. Effects were worst in the quadriceps and GM compared to the hamstrings and GL |
Alentorn-Geli et al55 | 40 soccer players | 22.3±6.8 | Complete ACL tear | VM, VL, RF, ST and BF | ↑Tr for VL, Tc for FR, Tc, Tr and Ts for RF, and Tr Dm for BF in injury side | ↓resistance to fatigue and muscle stiffness (ST and BF), may be an injury risk factor for ACL injury |
Alentorn-Geli et al54 | 40 Competive male soccer players | 22.3±6.8 | ACL tear | GM and GL | ↑Tr and Dm for GM in injured group | ↓resistance to fatigue and muscle stiffness of GM GM and GL may not be an injury risk factor for ACL |
Atiković et al59 | 1 artistic gymnastic Olympic medallist | 19 | Spinal cord injury | BF, ES, GMx, RF | |
…”