2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2006.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of antiparasitic treatment on dynamically and statically tested cognitive skills over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…School attendance increases for several reasons, some direct and related to morbidity. For example, deworming has been shown to improve cognition both in the short- and long-term (i.e., in communities 7–10 years after treatment) [58, 59]. …”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School attendance increases for several reasons, some direct and related to morbidity. For example, deworming has been shown to improve cognition both in the short- and long-term (i.e., in communities 7–10 years after treatment) [58, 59]. …”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even though the clinical effects of the helminths infection are clearly described, the effects of the infection on the cognition and educational development are less clear 7,8 . A revision study sought for evidences on the association between soil-transmitted helminths infections and the deleterious effects in children's development and cognition.…”
Section: Article/artigomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resumption of the development of cognitive abilities possibly compromised because of the infection may occur with the anthelmintic treatment 7 . Regarding the cognitive development…”
Section: Article/artigomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies in Tanzania (Grigorenko et al, 2006;, we found that students who looked rather incompetent cognitively on a static test in many cases looked quite competent on a dynamic test. Others have found the same (as reviewed in Grigorenko & Sternberg, 1998).…”
Section: Dynamic Testingmentioning
confidence: 96%