2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Apical Barriers and Root Filling Materials on Stress Distribution in Immature Teeth: Finite Element Analysis Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turker et al assessed the fracture resistance of teeth with simulated perforating internal resorption cavities repaired with different calcium silicate-based cement and backfilling materials such as MTA, MTA Plus, and Biodentine [11]. The fracture-resistant property of MTA was also evaluated by Chunn et al who compared MTA with Biodentine as a root-filling material using the finite element method and concluded that MTA is better than Biodentine [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turker et al assessed the fracture resistance of teeth with simulated perforating internal resorption cavities repaired with different calcium silicate-based cement and backfilling materials such as MTA, MTA Plus, and Biodentine [11]. The fracture-resistant property of MTA was also evaluated by Chunn et al who compared MTA with Biodentine as a root-filling material using the finite element method and concluded that MTA is better than Biodentine [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 In various studies that evaluated fracture resistance of immature teeth, no significant differences were found between MTA, Biodentine, Bioaggragate and CEM cement, 76,77 while in a study using finite element analysis, MTA was found to induce less stress on apical root dentine of immature teeth than Biodentine. 73 A CSC barrier of at least 4 mm thickness 75 can be placed in the apical portion of the root canal using appropriate pluggers. Because of the open apex, the plug material can be inadvertently extruded into the periradicular tissues.…”
Section: Apical Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study using a dynamic fluid‐flow monitoring technique reported that there was no difference between a 4‐mm MTA apical plug and a full‐length MTA root filling after cyclic loading 75 . In various studies that evaluated fracture resistance of immature teeth, no significant differences were found between MTA, Biodentine, Bioaggragate and CEM cement, 76,77 while in a study using finite element analysis, MTA was found to induce less stress on apical root dentine of immature teeth than Biodentine 73 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Al-Kahtani et al (2014) showed that 4-5 mm of MTA should be placed as an apical barrier to prevent apical leakage. 9,10 MTA is one of the most effective materials for sealing both iatrogenic and pathological communication between endodontic and periodontal spaces. 11 MTA has good sealing ability and biocompatibility and it has the ability to induce cementum-like hard tissue and periodontium around it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%