2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2009.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of artificial illumination on the nocturnal foraging of waders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
86
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, the principal effects, aside from those following from the associated carbon emissions, operate through the impacts on time partitioning by organisms (how they distribute activity through the day) and on their circadian rhythms and patterns of photoperiodism . Artificial nighttime lighting has been documented to change both the timing and the period over which organisms can capture resources, typically increasing the opportunities for diurnal species and reducing those for nocturnal ones (e.g., Garber 1978;Wolff 1982;Martin 1990;Negro et al 2000;Bird et al 2004;Perry and Fisher 2006;Frank 2009;Santos et al 2010;Rotics et al 2011). This alters species interactions (e.g., competition, predator-prey), and may in turn reshape community structure, and presumably associated ecosystem functions and processes, although the latter has yet to be demonstrated (Moore et al 2001(Moore et al , 2006Longcore and Rich 2004;Davies et al 2012).…”
Section: Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, the principal effects, aside from those following from the associated carbon emissions, operate through the impacts on time partitioning by organisms (how they distribute activity through the day) and on their circadian rhythms and patterns of photoperiodism . Artificial nighttime lighting has been documented to change both the timing and the period over which organisms can capture resources, typically increasing the opportunities for diurnal species and reducing those for nocturnal ones (e.g., Garber 1978;Wolff 1982;Martin 1990;Negro et al 2000;Bird et al 2004;Perry and Fisher 2006;Frank 2009;Santos et al 2010;Rotics et al 2011). This alters species interactions (e.g., competition, predator-prey), and may in turn reshape community structure, and presumably associated ecosystem functions and processes, although the latter has yet to be demonstrated (Moore et al 2001(Moore et al , 2006Longcore and Rich 2004;Davies et al 2012).…”
Section: Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such physiological responses to ALAN might differ between urban and rural animals, and suggest the possibility that at least some species might adapt to and thus tolerate the presence of artificial lights. Indeed, bright nights can also offer opportunities, for example extending foraging time found for a number of diurnal species (Santos et al, 2010;Dwyer et al, 2013;Russ et al, 2015;Dominoni et al, 2016), thereby likely providing fitness benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological consequences of the increasing presence of artificial LAN are well documented in animals although the evidence from natural populations, in particular, is frequently correlational [2,4,5]. Behaviourally, LAN is linked to an increase in the observed number of bird strikes and subsequent deaths [6,7] and changes in the foraging capacity and activity patterns of vertebrates [8][9][10][11][12] and invertebrates [5,13]. At the population level, animals living in well-lit urban environments are observed to shift the timing and structure of their mating calls [14][15][16][17] and the commencement of breeding [15,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%