2016
DOI: 10.1080/1062726x.2016.1166367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
85
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, organizational crisis response strategies are 'possible communication strategies' within a narrative response, but alone are not narratives (Venette et al, 2003, p. 219). A meta-analysis found that crisis communication response strategies are weakly associated with how the public assigns blame for crises (Ma & Zhan, 2016), leading to a call for research to look beyond blame as the key crisis communication outcome (Coombs, 2016). This study answers that call and examines how crisis narratives affect people's behavioral responses.…”
Section: Crisis Communication Narrative Typesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In other words, organizational crisis response strategies are 'possible communication strategies' within a narrative response, but alone are not narratives (Venette et al, 2003, p. 219). A meta-analysis found that crisis communication response strategies are weakly associated with how the public assigns blame for crises (Ma & Zhan, 2016), leading to a call for research to look beyond blame as the key crisis communication outcome (Coombs, 2016). This study answers that call and examines how crisis narratives affect people's behavioral responses.…”
Section: Crisis Communication Narrative Typesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Organizational reputation usually suffers in a crisis, because publics attribute responsibility to the organizations for what happens (Coombs, ; Coombs & Holladay, ; Ma & Zhan, ) and feel negative emotions (Coombs, ) toward the organizations. Anger is a discrete negative emotion that has received much attention in crisis communication research (Choi & Lin, ; Pace, Fediuk, & Botero, ).…”
Section: Crisis and Crisis Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crisis communication research has changed from a case study approach to a situational approach. Some research focuses on how the crisis features such as severity (Coombs, ) and controllability (McDonald, Sparks, & Glendon, ) affect publics’ appraisal of the crisis, while other research focuses on an organization's attributes and behaviours, including industry (Ritchie, ; Sellnow & Brand, ), core meaning of a brand (Ma, ) and organizational responses (Coombs, ; Ma & Zhan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this study used fictitious university stories to guard against an issue of the involvement of participants. Although publics’ evaluation towards matching crisis response strategies would not create much difference between the real‐crisis and fictitious‐crisis scenarios (Ma & Zhan, ); however, the use of real university crises could have generated different findings. Thus, the future research might want to use real crisis vignettes in their studies to increase external validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%