2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/418/1/012004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Austenite Stability on Forming and Work Hardening Behavior of 1.2 GPa Gen3 AHSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] Deformation factors such as strain state, strain rate, strain path, and temperature also affect the apparent stability of austenite, which affect formability. [30][31][32][33][34][35] For example, for a medium manganese TRIP steel, Wu et al showed that strain path changes during forming can be manipulated to achieve a desired retained austenite content and mechanical properties in stamped parts. [36] The deformation response of Q&P steels under nonlinear and dynamic loading conditions is of paramount interest to the sheet forming community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] Deformation factors such as strain state, strain rate, strain path, and temperature also affect the apparent stability of austenite, which affect formability. [30][31][32][33][34][35] For example, for a medium manganese TRIP steel, Wu et al showed that strain path changes during forming can be manipulated to achieve a desired retained austenite content and mechanical properties in stamped parts. [36] The deformation response of Q&P steels under nonlinear and dynamic loading conditions is of paramount interest to the sheet forming community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%