2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of barley intake and allocation regime on performance of growing dairy bulls offered highly digestible grass silage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend was observed in the present experiment in the steadily fed groups A and R, consistently with many other experiments (Keane 2010, Manni et al 2013, Manni et al 2016). …”
Section: Feed Conversion Ratesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This trend was observed in the present experiment in the steadily fed groups A and R, consistently with many other experiments (Keane 2010, Manni et al 2013, Manni et al 2016). …”
Section: Feed Conversion Ratesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This trend was observed in the present experiment ( Fig. 1) in accordance with many earlier experiments (Knoblich et al 1997, Rossi et al 2001, Huuskonen et al 2007, Huuskonen 2009, Manni et al 2016. During the compensatory growth LWG typically increases when feed or nutrient intake increases after a restriction period, even so much that it enables animals to catch up to the weight of animals whose growth was not reduced (Hornick et al 2000).…”
Section: Feed Intake and Growthsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports have shown no effects of silage digestibility on dressing proportion, carcass conformation and fat scores (Steen 1988b, Cummins et al 2007, Manninen et al 2011). However, increasing energy intake has often increased carcass conformation (Aronen et al 1994, Caplis et al 2005, Pesonen et al 2013, Huuskonen and Huhtanen 2015 and carcass fatness (Huuskonen et al 2007, Pesonen et al 2013, Huuskonen and Huhtanen 2015, Manni et al 2016 of growing and finishing cattle but these effects could not be demonstrated in the present experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The second group terms of feed allowance was more strict and firm than the first. The restriction of the amount of concentrate allowance such as by the second trial imposed on the second group of calves was found by other researchers (Manni et al, 2013), (Cross M et al, 2015) and (Manni et al, 2016) to be significant in terms of decreasing the wasted or lost feed intake and higher feed utilization efficiency. The FCR of the second trial was significantly (p<0.05) higher by almost 3 kg than the first trial (Table 2) which was also found in Sharabi breed calves (Abdullah et al 2010) fed on 4% concentrates of their body weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%