2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of BaRuO3 addition on hydrogen desorption in MgH2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the values in Table 1 , the activation energies computed via the Kissinger method are lower than those calculated via the Arrhenius method due to differences in the experimental environment. 46 In addition, the results are similar to those obtained relating to SDR, in which the values of E a decrease with an increase in the ball-milling time. This further indicates that the dehydrogenation process is a nucleation growth process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to the values in Table 1 , the activation energies computed via the Kissinger method are lower than those calculated via the Arrhenius method due to differences in the experimental environment. 46 In addition, the results are similar to those obtained relating to SDR, in which the values of E a decrease with an increase in the ball-milling time. This further indicates that the dehydrogenation process is a nucleation growth process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Apparently, the activation energy calculated by Arrhenius method is larger than that by Kissinger method. A very similar result was reported by Baricco et al [39]. Furthermore, we also note that, whichever method, increasing Ni content brings on a decrease in the hydrogen desorption activation energy and the E de values of the alloys decrease with milling time prolonging.…”
Section: Hydrogen Desorption Activation Energysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It indicates that activation energy counted by Kissinger method has a bit difference from the one by Arrhenius method that the former is smaller than the latter. Baricco et al [36] reported similar values. Therefore, whichever method is used, the as-milled alloy exhibits lower activation energy than the as-spun one.…”
Section: Hydrogen Desorption Activation Energymentioning
confidence: 64%