2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.094110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of biaxial strain on the improper multiferroicity inhLuFeO3films studied using the restrained thermal expansion method

Abstract: Elastic strain is potentially an important approach in tuning the properties of the improperly multiferroic hexagonal ferrites, the details of which have however been elusive due to the experimental difficulties. Employing the method of restrained thermal expansion, we have studied the effect of isothermal biaxial strain in the basal plane of h-LuFeO3 (001) films. The results indicate that a compressive biaxial strain significantly enhances the ferrodistortion, and the effect is larger at higher temperatures. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Due to the size difference of Lu 3+ and Yb 3+ , 14 the lattice constant of the basal plane of h-LuFeO3 is smaller than that of h-YbFeO3: a = 5.963 Å for h-LuFeO3 and a = 6.021 Å for h-YbFeO3. 31 Our recent work suggests that a compressive biaxial strain may reduce the canting of the Fe moments in h-REFeO3, 50 which is in line with the correlation between the lattice constant and weak ferromagnetic moment on Fe observed here.…”
Section: Comparison Between Magnetic Properties Of H-ybfeo3 and H-lufeo3supporting
confidence: 86%
“…16 Due to the size difference of Lu 3+ and Yb 3+ , 14 the lattice constant of the basal plane of h-LuFeO3 is smaller than that of h-YbFeO3: a = 5.963 Å for h-LuFeO3 and a = 6.021 Å for h-YbFeO3. 31 Our recent work suggests that a compressive biaxial strain may reduce the canting of the Fe moments in h-REFeO3, 50 which is in line with the correlation between the lattice constant and weak ferromagnetic moment on Fe observed here.…”
Section: Comparison Between Magnetic Properties Of H-ybfeo3 and H-lufeo3supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Here, we perform a comprehensive analysis of the interfacial reconstruction at a heterostructure combined with hexagonal ferrite and sapphire, whose lattice mismatch is almost 20%. The model system is hexagonal LuFeO 3 ( h -LuFeO 3 ), an important branch of hexagonal multiferroics, which has attracted much attention because of its improper ferroelectricity at room temperature, the weak ferromagnetism induced by Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) interactions, and the magnetoelectric effect based on the strong lattice–spin coupling. For h -LuFeO 3 ( P 6 3 cm , a = b = 5.9642 Å, c = 13.12607 Å, Figure a), it is separated by [LuO 2 ] and [FeO] layers along the c axis, where the closest coordinations between Lu–O and Fe–O are a distorted octahedron and a bipyramid, respectively. The trimerization of the FeO 5 bipyramid elicits the movement of Lu along the c axis, inducing the geometric ferroelectricity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 LuFeO 3 normally hosts an orthorhombic structure, although the pure hexagonal phase can be stabilized under epitaxial strain. 23 Similarly, A-site substitution with Sc, the smallest and lightest of the Group III elements, leads to a more compact lattice, which favors the hexagonal structure (Figure 1a). This is due to chemical pressure effects, which give rise to local strain.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferrites generally adopt either an orthorhombic or hexagonal crystal symmetry depending on the radius of the A -site ion . LuFeO 3 normally hosts an orthorhombic structure, although the pure hexagonal phase can be stabilized under epitaxial strain . Similarly, A -site substitution with Sc, the smallest and lightest of the Group III elements, leads to a more compact lattice, which favors the hexagonal structure (Figure a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%