2012
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2011121201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Biocompatible versus Standard Fluid on Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
215
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
215
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline characteristics of this subgroup were comparable to those of the original balANZ trial cohort (15). The median number of samples analyzed for patients during the study period was 4 (interquartile range: 2 -5).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline characteristics of this subgroup were comparable to those of the original balANZ trial cohort (15). The median number of samples analyzed for patients during the study period was 4 (interquartile range: 2 -5).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Data were obtained from the participants of the balANZ trial (ACTRN12606000044527) (15). Detailed description of the study design and methodology has been previously published (16), as have the results of the main primary and secondary analyses (15,17,18).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, available data are controversial. In the BALANZ trial, a multicenter, open-labeled, randomized clinical trial of PD patients in Australia and New Zealand, the use of biocompatible compared with conventional PD solutions was associated with a reduction of the overall peritonitis rate (0.30 vs. 0.49 episodes per patient-year) [6]. In contrast, a prospective longitudinal follow-up of almost 4,000 PD patients found no difference in peritonitis rate between newer, biocompatible PD solutions and conventional solutions [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the largest randomized controlled study on this subject, after an increase in the D/P creatinine ratio in the short term, low-GDP solutions were associated with a stabilization of peritoneal membrane function as compared to standard solutions (17,18). Importantly, peritoneal ultrafiltration volume is generally found to be higher with conventional as compared to low-GDP solutions of the same glucose concentrations (17,19). Although the underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated, more pronounced vasodilation and peritoneal capillary recruitment with conventional solutions may be implicated (20).…”
Section: Is the Effect Of Low-gdp Solutions On Residual Renal Functiomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Where there is ample evidence for a beneficial effect of low-GDP fluids on cell viability, as well as on peritoneal membrane structure and function from experimental trials, long-term data in humans are more scarce (15,16). In the largest randomized controlled study on this subject, after an increase in the D/P creatinine ratio in the short term, low-GDP solutions were associated with a stabilization of peritoneal membrane function as compared to standard solutions (17,18). Importantly, peritoneal ultrafiltration volume is generally found to be higher with conventional as compared to low-GDP solutions of the same glucose concentrations (17,19).…”
Section: Is the Effect Of Low-gdp Solutions On Residual Renal Functiomentioning
confidence: 99%