1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf01928533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of biuret content in urea and nitrogen source on the yield and composition of potato tubers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23] Relevant research has indicated that a high concentration of biuret in urea fertilizer is toxic to crops, including its seed, foliage, nitrogen metabolism and protein synthesis. [24][25][26] Additional research has shown that biuret impurity in urea fertilizer is a potential factor that enhances nitrite toxicity, 27 and it can affect the yield and composition of potato tubers 28 Therefore, the concentration of biuret is regarded as an important criterion to evaluate the quality of the urea fertilizer. Currently, liquid chromatography is used to measure the concentration of biuret in urea as an accepted method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) International.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Relevant research has indicated that a high concentration of biuret in urea fertilizer is toxic to crops, including its seed, foliage, nitrogen metabolism and protein synthesis. [24][25][26] Additional research has shown that biuret impurity in urea fertilizer is a potential factor that enhances nitrite toxicity, 27 and it can affect the yield and composition of potato tubers 28 Therefore, the concentration of biuret is regarded as an important criterion to evaluate the quality of the urea fertilizer. Currently, liquid chromatography is used to measure the concentration of biuret in urea as an accepted method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) International.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…availability of N, since the recovery of N from splitted dose rctl~iined higher than the whole dose of N applied at planting (Sharma et al (1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%