2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1625781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of boundary roughness on a Q factor of whispering-gallery-mode lasing microdisk cavities

Abstract: We perform numerical studies of the effect of sidewall imperfections on the resonant state broadening of the optical microdisk cavities for lasing applications. We demonstrate that even small edge roughness ( λ/30) causes a drastic degradation of high-Q whispering gallery (WG) mode resonances reducing their Q-values by many orders of magnitude. At the same time, low-Q WG resonances are rather insensitive to the surface roughness. The results of numerical simulation obtained using the scattering matrix techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These internal losses in the material can be alternatively taken into account by the mode equation using a complex-valued refractive indexñ = n + iλα/4π. Also the surface roughness Q surf can be directly modeled by the mode equation provided that fluctuations in the boundary function ρ = ρ(ϕ) are taken explicitly into account; see, e.g., (Rahachou and Zozoulenko, 2003).…”
Section: B Optical Losses and Quality Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These internal losses in the material can be alternatively taken into account by the mode equation using a complex-valued refractive indexñ = n + iλα/4π. Also the surface roughness Q surf can be directly modeled by the mode equation provided that fluctuations in the boundary function ρ = ρ(ϕ) are taken explicitly into account; see, e.g., (Rahachou and Zozoulenko, 2003).…”
Section: B Optical Losses and Quality Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q-factor is so huge that our numerics is pushed to the limit; as a conservative lower bound we estimate Q ≈ 10 8 . In practise, this theoretical bound for the Q-factor is unreachable nowadays due to absorption [2] and surfaces roughness [27], i.e. the introduction of the hole does not affect the experimental Q-factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduce the scattering matrix S in a standard fashion 11,12 , B = SA, where A, B are column vectors composed of the expansion coefficients A q , B q for incoming and outgoing states in Eq. (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%