The impact of three fire fighting chemicals (FFC) on 11 chemical soil properties and on soil recovery (0-2 cm depth) was evaluated 1, 30, 90 and 365 d after a prescribed fire. Five treatments were considered: unburnt soil (US) and burnt soil with 2 l m -2 of water alone (BS) or mixed with the foaming agent Auxquímica RFC-88 at 1% (BS+Fo), Firesorb at 1.5% (BS+Fi) and FR Cross ammonium polyphosphate at 20% (BS+Ap). At t=1 d, soil pH increases in the order US < BS . BS+Fo, BS+Fi < BS+Ap, which was most likely due to the accumulation of ashes, the reduction of organic acids and the cations supplied by FFC. In all burnt treatments, soil pH remained significantly higher than in US up until t=90 d. SOM richness remained similar and constant until t=90 d in all plots, but, probably due to fire-triggered erosion, at t=365 d it was significantly lower in BS+Ap (C, N), BS and BS+Fo (C) than in US. Immediately after the fire, soil * + -N levels in BS+Ap (200x that of US; 9-18x those of BS, BS+Fo and BS+Fi), and its persistence can delay the post-fire vegetation recovery due to the toxicity of NH 4 + to seeds and seedlings. NO 3 -N levels changed significantly only in BS+Ap between t=30 and t=90 d due to the nitrification of its large NH 4 + -N pool. Except in BS+Ap, whose soil P levels were 70-140x (t=1 d) and 10-20x (t=365 d) higher than in the other treatments, available P content in BS and BS+FFC was not significatively higher than in US. The concentrations of available cations in BS and BS+FFC were higher (not always significatively, except for K) than in US until t=90 d, likely due to ashes-and FFC-derived cations. Contrarily to divalent cations, monovalent cations (more soluble and easily leached) decreased slowly until t=90 d.