2022
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2047603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of business strategies on the selection of trusted taxpayers: case of South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Cao, Chen, Harakeh, and Lee (2022) and Cao, Chen, and Lee (2022) find that investment opportunities and firm performance moderate the impact of strategy on 5 Trusted taxpayer system is specific to South Korea where the requirements and characteristics of the trusted taxpayer system vary depending on the geographical area in South Korea. The Korean Customs Service and the Ministry of Strategy and Finance in South Korea deliberates the selection of trusted taxpayers based on the results of tax investigations conducted by the National Tax Service or recommendations from the National Tax Service or others (Suh & Park, 2022).…”
Section: Business Strategy Dividend Policy and Cash Holdingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, Cao, Chen, Harakeh, and Lee (2022) and Cao, Chen, and Lee (2022) find that investment opportunities and firm performance moderate the impact of strategy on 5 Trusted taxpayer system is specific to South Korea where the requirements and characteristics of the trusted taxpayer system vary depending on the geographical area in South Korea. The Korean Customs Service and the Ministry of Strategy and Finance in South Korea deliberates the selection of trusted taxpayers based on the results of tax investigations conducted by the National Tax Service or recommendations from the National Tax Service or others (Suh & Park, 2022).…”
Section: Business Strategy Dividend Policy and Cash Holdingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also find evidence to suggest that innovative firms with political connections are less tax aggressive compared to those without political connections due to the potential benefits received by the politically connected firms such as special resources and ability to access low‐cost‐capital. Using evidence from South Korea, Suh and Park (2022) find that PROSPECTOR firms are more likely to be trusted taxpayers than DEFENDER firms.…”
Section: Survey Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%