2015
DOI: 10.3354/esr00658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of bycatch on the population viability of the narrow-ridged finless porpoises in Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2015 ) and to estimate more accurately the true threat level from fisheries and other sources (Hashimoto et al . 2015 ; Huang et al . 2014 ; Parsons et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2015 ) and to estimate more accurately the true threat level from fisheries and other sources (Hashimoto et al . 2015 ; Huang et al . 2014 ; Parsons et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrow-ridged finless porpoises are an endangered species with a risk of extinction and are only distributed in shallow coastal waters around the western Pacific Ocean from the Taiwan Strait to China, Korea, and Japan [45,46]. Finless porpoises in Japan are strictly controlled under the Act on the protection of fishery resources [47], while various anthropogenic activities, including bycatch from the fisheries and boat strikes, currently threaten their survival [48]. Our findings show that finless porpoises have some flexibility to the anthropogenic impacts they experience daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the porpoise is not a commercial target in Japan, gillnet fishermen in Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay (Figure ) bycaught the porpoises at the rate of 0.237–0.257 individuals per gillnetter per year in 2007–2008 (Shirakihara & Shirakihara, ), which indicates that almost one individual was bycaught by one gillnetter in 4 years. Hashimoto, Shirakihara, and Shirakihara () reported that such high bycatch rates would pose a serious threat to the viability of the Ariake Sound and Tachibana Bay population. Future studies to evaluate the viability of the “Sendai Bay‐Fukushima” population, which is subject to bycatch pressure, will be conducted by estimating its abundance using aerial sighting surveys and evaluating the number of bycaught individuals by interviewing fishermen (Shirakihara & Shirakihara, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%